British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
Again, the Adjutant-general, if consulted, could have warned Dundas
to be chary of his battalions, since some of them would certainly
be required for the Fleet. The King’s Navy was labouring under the
grievances which in four years were to drive the seamen to mutiny; and
as a natural consequence men were hardly to be obtained by any means.
◆Feb. 7.◆ On the very day when the declaration of war was received,
the Fleet swallowed up two battalions; and by the end of March it had
absorbed so many men that only three regiments of the Line were to be
found south of the Tweed. In fact the Horse Guards did not know where
to turn for another battalion. This, however, did not prevent Dundas
from presently sending another emissary to Jamaica, to commit England
still more deeply to operations in the most leeward sphere of the West
Indies. Yet he had no reserve of any description to rely upon, except
fourteen thousand Hanoverians and eight thousand Hessians, which,
pursuant to the time-honoured practice, were taken into British pay;
and of these the latter only, being mercenaries pure and simple, could
be counted upon for service beyond sea.[108]
Since the kingdom was thus stripped of regular troops, it was necessary
to raise other forces for its security; but this also was done as
foolishly as possible. Early in February it was rightly and wisely
decided to call out nineteen thousand additional Militia; but in the
execution precisely the same mistake was made as in France. Personal
service was not insisted upon; there arose a great demand for
substitutes; and the Militia, instead of gaining a substantial increase,
simply cut off from the Army the sources of its supply of recruits. In
Scotland, which as yet had no Militia, recourse was made to the raising
of Fencible regiments, that is to say, of regular troops enlisted for
home-service and for the duration of the war only. This system had so
far been applied only on a small scale, the regiments of Fencibles
during the Seven Years’ War and the American War of Independence having
been but few;[109] but it now received great and sudden expansion. On
the 2nd of March authority was issued for the raising of seven regiments
of Fencible Infantry in Scotland at a stroke; besides one already
authorised for the Isle of Man ◆Feb. 20.◆, and another, added in April,
for the Orkney Islands.[110] With the leading magnates of Scotland at
their head, these new corps were speedily completed; but there was one
Scottish nobleman who went further than his peers, and raised a regiment
in the Highlands for general service. This was Thomas Humberstone
Mackenzie, afterwards the last Earl of Seaforth; and his regiment
remains with us, still known by his name, but yet more famous under its
number of the Seventy-eighth. The reader should take note of the
Fencible regiments, for in the years before us we shall see them
increased and multiplied in all three kingdoms. Meanwhile, he should
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account