British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
Meanwhile the Allies on the frontiers of France remained inactive; the
Austrians, indeed, blockading Condé, where the French kept them engaged
with incessant affairs of outposts, but the British contingent still
awaiting the orders which Dundas hesitated to give. In the third week
of April the chief of the British staff reported that a considerable
force of French was entrenched about Dunkirk, too strong to be attacked
by the Duke of York’s troops, and that there was no operation on which
the latter could be employed except in support of the Austrians.[117]
We shall presently recognise the unseen hand which had been working
at Dunkirk. ◆May 1.◆ Ten days more of uncertainty passed away, and at
last, on the 1st of May, Coburg produced a plan of operations. By the
middle of May he hoped to have about ninety-two thousand men,[118] to
which by the beginning of June would be added thirteen thousand more.
He proposed, therefore, to hasten the fall of Condé by a bombardment,
and then to advance with fifty-two thousand men to the siege of
Valenciennes, leaving a cordon of some forty thousand to cover every
imaginable point along a front of some fifty miles from Maubeuge on the
Sambre to Ostend on the sea. Valenciennes might be expected to fall
at the end of July, and then ten thousand men could be left to mask
Lille, while fifty thousand marched to the siege of Dunkirk. If this
plan were accepted, Coburg pledged himself to the Duke of York to lend
his best good-will to the attack on Dunkirk. On this assurance the
Duke recommended the plan to which at last Dundas gave his consent,
on the understanding that the other powers in general and Austria in
particular should give an immediate explanation of their ulterior
views. England, he repeated, could not allow so large a force in her
pay to be employed on operations whose object was undefined; and he
emphasised the statement by an inquiry as to the security of Ostend,
which so far had been the British port of disembarkation, evidently as
a hint that England reserved her right to withdraw her troops at any
moment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account