British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
The morning broke in dense fog, so that the main attack did not begin
until near seven o’clock, when the Duke of York’s column, after marching
most of the night, made its way with little resistance to Artres. There
failing to force the passage of the river, which was defended by five
batteries, the Duke left his heavy guns with about a third of his force
to engage the French artillery, and proceeded with the rest higher up
the stream to Maresches, where a ford was found, and the passage was
with some trouble and delay accomplished. Meanwhile Ferraris attacked
the long entrenchment on the eastern ridge, opening fire from three
batteries, while Abercromby on the right and four Austrian battalions on
the left advanced to the assault, and carried the works with little
difficulty, capturing seven guns and over one hundred prisoners. Two
French regiments of cavalry, which tried to turn the scale against the
assaulting columns, were most gallantly charged by the Austrian Hussars
and the Hanoverian Life Guards, and actually defeated, notwithstanding
that the victorious troops had all the disadvantage of a steep ascent
against them. Coburg then halted Ferraris’s column, until further news
should come of the Duke of York’s advance. But the Duke, after making a
wide turning movement by Querenaing and driving the French from their
outlying defences, found himself at sunset at the foot of the most
formidable ascent in the whole position, crowned at different points by
four redoubts which flanked each other. Thereupon, since his men had
been on foot for eighteen hours, he decided to defer the attack till
next morning. Elsewhere, the success of the various columns was
indifferent. Knobelsdorf could win no more than the outworks of Hasnon;
Clerfaye failed to take the camp of Anzin; and, though the Prince of
Orange drove the French from Orchies, his brother, Prince Frederick of
Orange, was foiled before Tourcoing. ◆May 24.◆ Coburg gave orders for
renewal of the attack on the entrenchments of Famars and Anzin at
daybreak of the 24th; but it was found that the French, after
reinforcing the garrison of Valenciennes, had evacuated all their
positions and retired to Bouchain. The trophies of the Allies were
seventeen guns, captured at various points, and three hundred prisoners;
and the further loss of the French was set down, doubtless with
exaggeration, at three thousand killed and wounded. Even so the results
of the day were unsatisfactory. The Austrians, of course, blamed the
Duke of York; and Murray, without specifying who was in fault, wrote
privately that a great deal more might have been done.[137] But, in
truth, no one except an Austrian of that period could have looked for
great results from so feeble and faulty a plan of attack.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account