British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
from the Duke’s, a general action should be fought, as an essential
preliminary to the subsequent operations.[143]
The position of the French under General Kilmain was known as that
of Caesar’s Camp, which lies on the left bank of the Scheldt about
two miles above Bouchain; but in reality it formed an irregular
quadrilateral, of which a part of Villars’s famous lines of La Bassée
formed the northern side. Facing due east, Kilmain’s front was covered
by the Scheldt from Bouchain to Cambrai, his rear by the river Agache,
which runs into the Sensée a little to the south of Arleux, his right
by the Sensée, and his left by the wood and heights of Bourlon from
Cambrai to Marquion. All passages over the Scheldt were closed by
entrenchments, and the valley itself was flooded; all passages over
the Sensée were equally defended, while the right from Cambrai to
Agache was strengthened by field-works and abatis. Such a position,
held by sixty thousand men, was formidable, and Coburg accordingly
resolved to turn it by the south. The turning column, consisting of
fourteen thousand men under the Duke of York, was to assemble about
Villers-en-Cauchies and Saint Aubert, and to cross the Scheldt at
Masnières and Crevecœur, about five miles south of Cambrai. A second
column of about nine thousand men under the Austrian General Colloredo,
and a third of about twelve thousand under General Clerfaye, were to
force the passage of the Scheldt in the front of the position. The
remainder of the army, little less than half of it, was uselessly
frittered away in posts of observation.
Murray, foreseeing that the French would retire as soon as they
perceived the turning movement, begged persistently that more cavalry
should be given to the Duke of York, in order to inflict some
punishment on them. His request was refused, and the result was
exactly that which he had expected. ◆Aug. 7.◆ The Duke, after a march
of eleven hours on a day of extraordinary heat, found his troops too
much exhausted to pass the river at Masnières; and Kilmain, withdrawing
quietly in the night, made good his retreat upon Arras with little
loss, though the British cavalry made a few prisoners. The Austrians,
of course, blamed the Duke of York, though Coburg had sent Hohenlohe
with him for the express purpose of superintending his operations; but
the arrangements of the day opened Murray’s eyes to the essential vices
of the Austrian tactics. “We were not in force to attack the enemy,”
he wrote; “the Duke’s column was a long way from support, and between
ourselves we were not sorry to see them go off.” It was only after long
schooling by disaster that the Austrians at last abandoned a system of
which the rottenness was clear to the much despised Briton.[144]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account