British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
The Light Dragoons likewise continued to belie their name, being
trained in reality simply as cavalry of the line of battle; but for
this, probably, the civil rather than the military authorities of the
Army were responsible, for at this period it was literally impossible
to obtain officers for the mounted troops. It will be remembered that
before the outbreak of the war the Adjutant-general had constantly, but
in vain, endeavoured to obtain an increase of the wholly inadequate
pittance of pay meted out to subalterns of dragoons. Even in peace
the burdens laid upon them were too heavy to be borne, and to these
were now added inadequate compensation for losses in the field, only
eighteen pounds being granted to replace a charger which had cost
thirty-five. The consequences became immediately apparent. The Duke of
York was obliged to beg that the cornetcies of regiments serving in the
Low Countries might be given away, since purchasers for them could not
be found.[204] Thus the Light Dragoons were untaught, because there
were no officers to teach them; patrols and advanced detachments lacked
the daring and adventurous leading of youth; and one of the highest
schools for the training of subalterns was wholly neglected. It is
hardly possible to estimate the evil consequences of Pitt’s misdirected
parsimony, in devoting to the hire of mercenaries the money which
should have been spent in the improvement of the British Army.
So much must be said of the regular forces; but the year 1794 was not
less remarkable for an enormous increase in the number of the Fencible
regiments, Militia and Volunteers, all due to Carnot’s menace of
invasion. The estimate for the Fencible Cavalry provided in March 1794
for forty troops; by May this figure had already risen to ninety-two
troops, and was still rising. Next, the number of the embodied Militia
for England was augmented to thirty-six thousand; while by an Act of the
Irish Parliament, passed in 1793, sixteen thousand additional Militia
were levied in Ireland. This latter was an entirely new departure; and
it need hardly be said that the first ballots drawn on the west of St.
George’s Channel led to serious rioting.[205] Provision was also made in
the estimates, and a Bill was introduced for the raising of six thousand
Militia in Scotland; but this measure was for the moment deferred, in
order that familiarity might ultimately facilitate its passing. The
formation of the Scottish Militia, however, appears to have been begun
in anticipation,[206] and men were enlisted who, later in the year,
◆Oct. 15–Nov. 20.◆ were formed into over twenty battalions of Fencible
infantry. The extension of the ballot throughout the three kingdoms,
though not actually completed until the passing of the Scottish Militia
Act in 1797, must be regarded as the most important military step taken
since the passing of the Militia Act of 1757 by the elder Pitt; and due
credit should be allowed to the Government for it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account