British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
general admission behaved admirably, lost fifty-two men and ninety-two
horses. The total loss of the British of all ranks was nine hundred
and thirty, besides which nineteen out of their twenty-eight guns were
captured.
It may be asked what the rest of the army was doing on this day, while
these two columns, together less than one-third of the whole, were
in process of annihilation. The answer is that, for some reason, it
observed a conspiracy of inaction. Bussche sat still at Dottignies
exchanging occasional shots with Jardon’s brigade. Clerfaye crossed
the Lys near Wervicq at seven o’clock in the morning, and turning
eastward advanced between Bousbecque and Linselles, where he was met
by Vandamme’s brigade, which numbered eight thousand men against his
sixteen thousand. He engaged the French, overthrew their right wing,
took eight guns, and then remained stationary; until, being informed
of the approach of more French troops about Bondues, he withdrew to
the Lys, which he recrossed on the next day, and thence retreated
northward. The behaviour of Kinsky and of the Archduke Charles was
still more extraordinary. Kinsky, on being asked by one of his officers
for orders at six o’clock in the morning, replied that he was sick
and no longer in command. The Archduke Charles received at five in
the morning the order to move at once upon Lannoy, a distance of six
miles, so that his troops might well have come upon the scene of action
between eight and nine. He did not march till noon, though within sound
of the guns, nor did he strike the road from Tournai to Lille until
three, when he received orders to return to Tournai. The military
renown justly earned later by the Archduke forbids us to believe that
this delay was due to ignorance; and the fact that, though the Duke of
York had early informed the Emperor of his danger, not a word was sent
to hasten the Archduke or Kinsky, shows clearly that their torpidity
was not unexpected nor disapproved at headquarters. Jealousy of the
Duke of York and of Mack are among the reasons assigned to account
for the general paralysis of the Austrian commanders; but possibly
the true reason was that Thugut was sick of the war in Belgium, and
wished the English to sicken of it also. Why he should have chosen the
slaughter of several hundred British and Austrians as the best means
of forwarding his purpose, and how he persuaded Austrian officers to
second him therein, are matters which only an Austrian can determine.
For us it must suffice that the decisive battle of the campaign was
lost by the deliberate design of the Imperial Generals. Before long
they were to learn that those who court defeat for dishonest ends may,
when they least desire it, find defeat thrust upon them.[242]
VOL. IV. BOOK XII. CHAPTER XI
◆1794.◆
◆May 19.◆
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account