British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
It cannot be said that either of them was sorry to take leave of the
other. Even in 1793 their relations had not been too cordial, for the
Austrians, in their jealousy, would never allow foreign troops to
pass through their fortified towns, even during a forced march; and
thus the British were frequently condemned to make long and fatiguing
detours.[259] But the betrayal of the Duke of York’s column on the
18th of May, and the subsequent operations, deliberately contrived to
hasten the evacuation of the Netherlands, converted the dislike of
the British for the Austrians into the bitterest hatred and contempt.
At headquarters, again, the presence of a soldier such as Craig, with
ideas far more enlightened than those of the Austrians, and with some
means of insisting upon them through the medium of the Duke of York,
can hardly have contributed to harmony. It may be added that the
Austrian troops were as severe in their criticism of their chiefs,
and particularly of Waldeck, as were any of the British, proclaiming
loudly that the abandonment of Belgium was due to French gold.[260] In
fact the Austrian army, between heavy losses and deep distrust of its
leaders, was utterly demoralised; nor is it surprising that this should
have been so. It is indeed more than probable that, if Coburg had
wished to make a stand after the action of Fleurus, his men would not
have supported him. Of course Coburg had to bear the responsibility for
all this, and to digest as best he might some very bitter reproaches
from the Duke of York; yet it seems that in truth he was the person
the least to blame. Though as a commander in the field he was slow,
unenterprising, enamoured of vicious methods, and possessed of no
military quality except that of looking carefully to the wants of
his troops, yet he did not lack insight, sound sense, imperturbable
calm, and the instinct of honesty and straightforwardness. His name is
forgotten in England, though his portrait is still occasionally to be
found in English print-shops, showing that at one time he had gained
a certain fame, which was destined speedily to perish. It can only be
said of him that he was beloved by his men, that he bore the sins of
others without complaining, and that he was a loyal servant to an
unfaithful master.
VOL. IV. BOOK XII. CHAPTER XII
◆1794.◆
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account