British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
British Campaigns in Flanders 1690-1794: Being Extracts from "A History of the British Army"
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Flanders -- History, Military; Great Britain -- History, Military -- 18th century
The Allied Generals decided to attack on the following day. Königseck,
it is said, was for harassing Saxe’s communications and compelling
him to raise the siege of Tournay; but, finding himself overruled
by Cumberland and by Waldeck, he gave way. Cumberland’s force was
decidedly inferior in numbers, being less than fifty thousand against
fifty-six thousand men, but he was young and impetuous, and had
been strongly impressed by the disastrous inaction of the preceding
campaign. It was agreed that the Dutch and Austrians should assail the
French centre and right, the Dutch in particular being responsible
for Fontenoy, while the British attacked the French left between that
village and the forest of Barry.
[Illustration:
FONTENOY
April 30th/May 11th 1745
_Stanford’s Geogl. Estabt., London._
]
◆April 30./May 11.◆
At two o’clock on the following morning the British began to move out
of their camp upon Vezon, the cavalry leading. The advance took much
time, for there were many narrow lanes to be traversed before the force
could debouch upon the slope, and, when the slope was passed, it was
still necessary to defile through the village of Vezon. Cumberland’s
order of attack was simple. Brigadier Ingoldsby, with the Twelfth and
Thirteenth Foot, the Forty-second Highlanders, a Hanoverian battalion,
and three six-pounder cannon, was to assault the Redoubt d’Eu on the
right flank of the line of the British advance, and to carry it with
the bayonet. The remainder of the infantry was simply to march up
across the thousand yards of open ground between it and Fontenoy and
sweep the enemy out of their entrenchments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account