British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable?Pratt, Edwin A.
History
British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable?
Pratt, Edwin A.
Canals -- Great Britain; Inland navigation -- Great Britain
These figures give point to the further remark made by Mr Inglis at the
meeting of the Institution of Civil Engineers when he said, "It was
not to be imagined that the railway companies would willingly have all
their canal property lying idle; they would be only too glad if they
could see how to use the canals so as to obtain a profit, or even to
reduce the loss."
On the same occasion, Mr A. Ross, who also took part in the debate,
said he had had charge of a number of railway-owned canals at different
times, and he was of opinion there was no foundation for the
allegation that railway-owned canals were not properly maintained. His
first experience of this kind was with the Sankey Brook and St Helens
Canal, one of wide gauge, carrying a first-class traffic, connecting
the two great chemical manufacturing towns of St Helens and Widnes,
and opening into the Mersey. Early in the seventies the canal became
practically a wreck, owing to the mortar on the walls having been
destroyed by the chemicals in the water which the manufactories had
drained into the canal. In addition, there was an overflow into the
Sankey Brook, and in times of flood the water flowed over the meadows,
and thousands of acres were rendered barren. Mr Ross continued (I quote
from the official report):--
"The London and North-Western Railway Company, who owned the canal,
went to great expense in litigation, and obtained an injunction
against the manufacturers, and in the result they had to purchase all
the meadows outright, as the quickest way of settling the question
of compensation. The company rebuilt all the walls and some of the
locks. If that canal had not been supported by a powerful corporation
like the London and North-Western Railway, it must inevitably have
been in ruins now. The next canal he had to do with, the Manchester
and Bury Canal, belonging to the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway
Company, was almost as unfortunate. The coal workings underneath the
canal absolutely wrecked it, compelling the railway company to spend
many thousands of pounds in law suits and on restoring the works,
and he believed that no independent canal could have survived the
expense. Other canals he had had to do with were the Peak Forest, the
Macclesfield and the Chesterfield canals, and the Sheffield and South
Yorkshire Navigation, which belonged to the old Manchester Sheffield
and Lincolnshire Railway. Those canals were maintained in good order,
although the traffic was certainly not large."
On the strength of these personal experiences Mr Ross thought that
"if a company came forward which was willing to give reasonable
compensation, the railway companies would not be difficult to deal
with."
The "Shropshire Union" is a railway-controlled canal with an especially
instructive history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account