British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable? — John Shaqi
British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable?Pratt, Edwin A.
History
British Canals: Is their resuscitation practicable?
Pratt, Edwin A.
Canals -- Great Britain; Inland navigation -- Great Britain
There is, also, that very important consideration, from a transport
standpoint, of the "length of haul." Assuming, for the sake of argument
(1) that the commercial conditions were the same in Great Britain as
they are on the Continent; (2) that our country, also, consisted of
a "great lowland plain"; and (3) that we, as well, had great natural
waterways, like the Rhine, yielding an abundant water supply;--assuming
all this, it would still be impossible, in the circumscribed dimensions
of our isles, to get a "length of haul" in any way approaching the
barge-journeys that are regularly made between, say, North Sea ports
and various centres in Germany.
The geographical differences in general between Great Britain and
Continental countries were thus summed up by Mr W. H. Wheeler in the
discussion on Mr Saner's paper at the Institution of Civil Engineers:--
"There really did not seem to be any justification for Government
interference with the canals. England was in an entirely different
situation from Continental countries. She was a sea-girt nation, with
no less than eight first-class ports on a coast-line of 1,820 miles.
Communication between these by coasting steamers was, therefore,
easy, and could be accomplished in much less time and at less cost
than by canal. There was no large manufacturing town in England that
was more than about 80 miles in a direct line from a first-class
seaport; and taking the country south of the Firth of Forth, there
were only 42-1/2 square miles to each mile of coast. France, on the
other hand, had only two first-class ports, one in the north and the
other in the extreme south, over a coast-line of 1,360 miles. Its
capital was 100 miles from the nearest seaport, and the towns in
the centre of the country were 250 to 300 miles from either Havre
or Marseilles. For every mile of coast-line there were 162 square
miles of country. Belgium had one large seaport and only 50 miles of
coast-line, with 227 square miles of country to every square mile.
Germany had only two first-class ports, both situated on its northern
coast; Frankfort and Berlin were distant from those ports about 250
miles, and for every mile of coast-line there were 231 square miles
of country. The necessity of an extended system of inland waterways
for the distribution of produce and materials was, therefore, far more
important in those countries than it was in England."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account