British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege — John Shaqi
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
Though, of course, the Royal rank increased the woman’s power, the law
and custom for Queens was but the reflex of the common law and custom of
the time for all women. Selden says, “Ladies of birth and quality sat in
the Saxon Witenagemot,” and Gurdon, in his “Antiquities of Parliament,”
vol. i., p. 164, adds, “Wightred, the next Saxon legislator, summoned
his Witas to the Witenagemot at Berghamstead, where his laws were made
with the advice and consent of his Witas (which is a _general_ term for
the nobility), for the laws were signed by the King, Werburg his Queen,
the Bishops, Abbots, Abbesses, and the _rest_ of the Witas” (_see_ “Sax.
Chron.,” 48). In Spelman’s “Concilia Britannica,” p. 190, we find also
that Wightred’s council at Beconceld (694) included women, for the Queen
and Abbesses signed the decisions along with the King and the Abbots (p.
192). The charter to Eabba the Abbess is granted by Wightred and his
Queen (p. 486).
The charter to Glastonbury is signed, after the name of the King, “Ego
Eilfgiva ejusdem Regis Mater cum gaudio consensi” (p. 533). In the
“Diploma Comiti, Regis Angliæ,” after the King’s name, “Ego Emma Regina
signo crucis confirmo.”
The second charter of Edward the Confessor to St. Peter’s at Westminster
contains not only the signature of the sainted King, but “Ego Editha
Regina huic donationi Regiæ consentiens subscripsi” (p. 631). And at the
council summoned to consider the Bull of Nicholas the Pope to Edward the
Confessor, after the King, signs “Ego Edgida Regina omni alacritate
mentis hoc corroboravi.” The different expressions used, show that the
signatures were no mere accident, no vapid formality.
In the council held to grant privileges to the Church “præsentibus etiam
clarissimis Abbattissis, hoc est, Hermehilda, Truinberga and Ataba
reverenda, ut subscriberent rogavi” (p. 198).
“King Edgar’s charter to the Abbey of Crowland (961) was signed with the
consent of the nobles and abbesses, for many Abbesses were formerly
summoned to Parliament” (Plowden’s “Jura Anglorum,” p. 384. Also William
Camden’s “Antiquity of Parliament”).
“Ego Ælfrith Regina” signs the Charter that the King of Mercia grants to
the Abbey of Worcester. “Ethelswith Regina” subscribes with Burghred,
King of Mercia or Mercland, in the Register of Worcester.
Edward the Confessor’s charter to Agelwin is confirmed by his wife, “Ego
Edgith Regina consentio.”
So in a charter of King Knut to St. Edmundesbury, his wife, Alfgwa,
signs, “Ego Alfgifa Regina” (Selden’s “Titles of Honour”).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account