British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege — John Shaqi
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
anything that _it has been_, or else reformation would be impossible.
But when the sole argument against its _being_ is that it _has not
been_, the consideration of Legality and of Precedent becomes a
necessity to the advocates of Justice. Many mistakes have been taken for
facts, many fallacious arguments based upon erroneous premises. A Review
of the History of Women that have hitherto ever exercised any privilege
is necessary for generalisations to be based thereon. For by this
process we may unite the followers of Legality and Precedent with the
worshippers of Justice and Equality, and the union of the two forces,
like those of the sun and moon upon the sea, may raise the high “tide in
the affairs of women that leads on to fortune.”
The Review is encouraging in two aspects. In the light of the modern
doctrine of Heredity, we see that our far-away ancestors held opinions
to which we may hope that our successors may yet _revert_; and from
Ancient History we find that a recognition of the existence of women in
the State, far from being novel or revolutionary, would only be the
fulfilling of the fundamental principles of the English Constitution.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER III.
ROYAL WOMEN.
“The country prospers when a woman rules.”
IN order to simplify and classify the mass of material at hand, it is
advisable to take by their degree the ranks of women among the
Anglo-Normans. Among the Queens, only because they precede in order of
time and of number, we may take first
=Queens Consort.=—In Doomsday Book, Matilda, the wife of the Conqueror,
is entered as holding of the King, many lands forfeited by the Saxons.
“She was made the feudal possessor of the lands of Beortric, Earl of
Gloucester, hence the practice of settling the Lordship of Bristol on
the Queen generally, prevailed for centuries. On her death in 1083, her
lands went back to the King by feudal tenure. The Conqueror kept them in
his own hands, meaning them for his and her youngest son Henry, who
afterwards succeeded.” (Seyer’s “Memoirs of Bristol,” chap. iv., p.
318). Later queens had separate establishments, officers and privy
purse. “The Aurum Reginæ, or Queen’s Gold, is distinguished from all
other debts and duties belonging to the Queen of this Realme. All other
revenues proceed to her from the grace of the King, this by the common
law ... which groweth upon all fines paid to the King, licenses,
charters, pardons, of which she receives one-tenth part. After her death
the King recovers his right to hold this tenth. This duty hath been
enjoyed by the Queens from Eleanor, wife of Henry II. to Anne, second
wife of Henry VIII.” (Hakewell’s speech in Parliament on Aurum Reginæ.
Addit. MSS., Brit. Mus. 25, 255.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account