British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
Both she and her sister, at their coronations, were girt with the sword
of State, and invested with the spurs of knighthood, to show that they
were military as well as civil rulers. Fortunately for her country, and
for herself, Elizabeth lived and died a maiden Queen. The bitter
consequences of her sister’s Spanish alliance taught her the importance
of independence as a ruler. Whatever we may individually think of her
character, all must allow her reign to have been in every way the most
brilliant in the history of our country, only equalled in our own times
by that of a Matron Queen, who has held the reins of Government in her
own hand and whose husband came to the land but as Prince Consort. Queen
Anne’s reign is also worthy of note, and can bear comparison with that
of most Kings, for its military successes, and its literary activities.
=Queens Regent.=—Selden argues against Bodin of Anjou, who upheld the
Salic Law, “are not discretion and strength, courage, and the arts of
Government more to be desired and required in those who have the tuition
of kings in their minority, than in the kings themselves till they are
come of age?” He considers the French use of Queens as Regents to be
destructive of their own theories.
Queens as Regent-Tutors of young kings have not held the same position
in England as they did in France or in Scotland. But as governing
Regents and Viceroys they have often done good service. William of
Normandy more than once left the country in charge of his Queen. Richard
I., by commission, appointed his mother, Eleanor, to be Regent of the
Kingdom in his absence, and wrote to her to find the money for his
ransom when imprisoned abroad. She sat as Judge in the Curia Regis,
taking her seat on the King’s Bench by right of her office. She granted
concessions to the inhabitants of Oléron (to women as to men) even down
to the reign of John (1 John; _see_ “Rymer’s Fœdera”). Edward III. found
his Queen Philippa a Queen Regent worthy of himself. Henry V. appointed
his mother as Regent in his absence, and even Henry VIII., when he went
abroad on his last French War, left his Queen, Catherine Parr, Governor
of the Kingdom. I have gone through their correspondence in the Public
Record Office, and it bears ample testimony to her capability and his
trust in her judgment. In “Olive _versus_ Ingram,” 1739, it is noted,
“Queen Caroline was once appointed Regentor of the Kingdom.”
It was with little less than Vice Regal splendour and power that Joan,
Dowager Countess of Pembroke, ruled the Palatinate for nine years in the
reign of Edward I.; or Isabel de Burgo in that of Edward II., or Agnes
de Hastings in that of Edward III.; ruling in the stead of their sons
until the youths attained majority at the age of twenty-one.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER IV.
NOBLEWOMEN.
“Noblesse Oblige.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account