British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege — John Shaqi
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
This practice seems to have long survived in modified forms. In same
Report, p. 2850, regarding the Borough of Ruthin, “It was in evidence,
and was indeed frankly admitted by the deputy-steward, that, upon
impanelling the jury at the Borough Court Leet it is the uniform
practice for some agent of the Lady of the Manor to address a letter,
which is delivered to the foreman of the jury in their retiring-room,
recommending two persons as aldermen, who are invariably elected. As a
part of this system, it was proved that in many instances the duties and
fees payable on the admission of burgesses to their freedom had been
defrayed by the Lady of the Manor; and that the uncontrolled power of
impanelling the jury was left to her agent. The only answer furnished by
the deputy-steward was that he had taken for his guide the usage of the
place, as pursued by his predecessors, without reference to charters,
which had only of late years come under discussion.” Also in page 2840,
regarding Rhuddlan, “As far as any ruling body or corporation can be
said to subsist in a borough thus circumstanced, the Lady of the Manor
must be considered to elect that body; for the Steward of the Court Leet
is appointed by her during pleasure; and he gives the constables a list
of the persons who are to serve on the jury by whom the two bailiffs,
the only subsisting officers of the corporation, are chosen.” The Lady
of the Manor there also paid the Constables.
=Held by Military Service.=—There were 15 ladies summoned for military
service against Wales “de fide et homagio,” in 5 Edward I., and again in
10 Edward I. Among these were Devorgilla de Balliol, Agnes de Vescy,
Dionysia de Monte Canisio, and Margaret de Ros. A writ was issued to
Isabella de Ros, commanding her “in fide et homagio” to send her service
to the muster at Portsmouth for the King’s expedition to Gascony, 14th
June, 1234. Elena de Lucy was summoned from the county of Northampton
“to perform military service in parts beyond the sea. Muster at London,
7th July, 25 Edward I.” Joan Disney of Lincoln was summoned “to perform
military service against the Scots. Muster at London, 7th July, 25
Edward I.” These are but a few selected from many others that appear in
Palgrave’s Parliamentary Writs. It is true that a substitute might be
sent by anyone, _male or female_, with reasonable excuse. “On 16th
April, 1303, proclamation was made that all prelates, persons of
religion, women and persons who were unfit for military service, who
were willing to commute their service by fines, might appear before the
Barons of the Exchequer at York on 17th May ensuing. Otherwise they, or
their substitutes, must appear at the muster at Berwick on the 26th
May.”
Palgrave’s Parliamentary Writs give long lists of women holding castles,
towns, and military feods in 9 Edward II., and Harl. MS., 4219, in
“Hundreds, Civitates, Burgi, and Villæ in Comitatu Norfolk et _Domini_
eorundem,” gives many names of women.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account