British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
the Attorney of Margaret, widow of Sir Henry Vavasour. In another return
from the County of York, one Attorney signs for the Earl of
Westmoreland, and another for the Countess, for the lands each held as
freeholds in that neighbouring county.
Footnote 7:
The first use of the word “Parliamentum” occurs in the Prologue to the
Statutes of Westminster in 1 Edward I.
Footnote 8:
Prynne notes that only Cedules have been preserved of the returns of
the knights before the Statute of 7 Henry IV., c. xiii.
Prynne also preserves an Indenture signed by the attorney of Lucia, the
widowed Countess of Kent (13 Hen. IV.). This lady was an Italian, a
Visconti, the daughter of the Duke of Milan, and her foreign extraction,
or her failing fortunes at the time,[9] may have induced her to exercise
her privilege as regards the Member of Parliament, while she preserved
the dignity of her nobility by voting by Attorney.
Footnote 9:
_See_ Petitions to Parliament (Hen. IV.), Burke’s “Extinct Peerages,”
“Inquisitions _Post-Mortem_.” (Hen. V.)
I have not found any example of a lady “Knight of the Shire,” but
neither have I found the shadow of a _law_ against their existence
beyond that of the electors’ choice, or the ladies’ convenience. Anne
Clifford said that if her candidate did not come forward “she would
stand herself.” (Dr. Smith to Williamson, Jan. 1668. Dom. Ser. State
Papers, Public Record Office.) But as women summoned to do military
service were _allowed_ to send a substitute, as women summoned to the
County Courts were _allowed_ to absent themselves, and _allowed_ to send
an Attorney, so were they allowed to send their knights to the House of
Commons.
If women of the Middle Ages had but realised what their ancestresses did
before them, “that they were receiving what they must hand down to their
children neither tarnished nor depreciated, what future daughters-in-law
may receive, and may so pass on to their grandchildren” (Tacitus Germ.,
c. viii.), the needs of litigation on this point might not have arisen
later.
=Could Nominate to Private Boroughs.=—Certain Boroughs formerly held by
military tenure seemed to have been included in those permitted to
return burgesses to Parliament, though belonging to one owner. When
women inherited the property and held the Borough, they returned their
one or two members, as the custom might be, in their own name. “The
members of many ancient Boroughs were often returned by the Lords, and
sometimes by the Ladies of the Manors or Boroughs” (Plowden’s “Jura
Anglorum,” p. 438). Many cases are doubtless lost among the piles of
missing records. But two very illustrative examples have been preserved
for us, just sufficient to clear away all doubts from the minds of
students of history that women sometimes exercised the privileges they
possessed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account