British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege — John Shaqi
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
Mr. William Copley was not inclined tamely to resign the ancient
privilege of his family of sending up Burgesses for their own Borough;
he attempted to do so again, in spite of the decision of 1620, and
through the adverse decision in his case, Parliament affirmed, and Sir
Edward Coke with it, the right of a woman to vote.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER VI.
FREEWOMEN.
“Preserve your Loyalty, defend your Rights.”
—_Anne Clifford’s Sundial Motto._
IN days when the word “Free” had no doubtful signification, women could
be “Free” in several different ways. They could be Freeholders in towns
by inheritance or by purchase. They could be Free of “Companies,” in
some of them by patrimony, service, or payment; in others through being
widows of Freemen only. In some cases a widow’s “Freedom” was limited by
the conditions of her husband’s will, but in almost all of the
Companies, at least, in London, _some_ women could be Free. They could
be Free in Boroughs, under the same conditions as men, by paying
brotherhood money, and by sharing in the common duties of Burgesses, as
“Watch and Ward,” “Scot and Lot,” and the service of the King; they
could be “Free” as regards the Corporation, and they could be “Free” as
regards voting for members of Parliament.
I have preferred to use the word “Freewomen” as more definite than any
other. The “Widows and Spinsters” phrase of to-day does not carry back
to old history. Under certain limited conditions married women could be
“Free”; under certain other conditions they could be “Spinsters.”
“The case of a wife trading alone. And where a woman coverte de Baron
follows any craft within the city by herself apart, with which the
husband in no way interferes, such woman shall be bound as a single
woman as to all that concerns her craft. And if the husband and wife are
impleaded in such case, the wife shall plead as a single woman in a
Court of Record, and shall have her law and other advantages by way of
plea just as a single woman.” She has her duties and penalties as well
as her privileges, can be imprisoned for debt, etc. (_See_ “The Liber
Albus of London,” compiled 1419, translated by J. Riley, Book III., p.
39.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account