British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
The Guild of the Holy Cross in Birmingham, to which belonged the
well-disposed men and women of Birmingham and the neighbouring towns,
had Letters Patent in 1392. The Report of its Condition in the reign of
Edward VI. says, “It kept in good reparacions two great stone Bridges
and divers foule and dangerous wayes, the charge whereof the town, of
hitselfe ys not hable to manteign, so that the lacke thereof will be a
great noysaunce to the Kinges Majesties subjects passing to and from the
marches of Wales, and an utter ruyne to the same towne, being one of the
largest and most profitable townes to the Kinges Highness in all the
Shyre” (Toulmin Smith’s “English Gilds,” pp. 244-249).
These might have weathered the storms of the Reformation by giving up
candles and masses, had not Henry seized their revenues and revoked
their foundations.
The Trades Guilds in early days were also semi-religious in their
character, and also admitted women as sisters.
William Herbert’s “History of the Twelve Great Livery Companies” gives
many details interesting to us. All the Charters of the Drapers’ Company
expressly admit Sisters with full rights; the wearing of the Livery, the
power of taking apprentices, sitting at the election feasts, making
ordinances among themselves for better governance, etc. (vol. i., p.
422). So also did the Clothworkers.
So also the Brewers’ Company. In 5 Henry V. there were 39 women on the
Company’s Livery paying full quarterage money. In 9 Henry V. there are
entries in the books, of the purchase of cloth for the clothing of the
Brethren and Sistern of the Fraternity of the Brewers’ Craft. So also
the Fishmongers (p. 59), the Weavers,[13] and other companies. “The
office of Plumber of the Bridge granted to the Widow Foster, 1595.”
(Guildhall Records.)
Footnote 13:
_See_ “Liber Customarum,” p. 544, etc.
The Clockmakers’ Company, though only founded in 1632, had female
apprentices sanctioned by the company so late as 1715, 1725, 1730, 1733,
1734, 1747.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account