British freewomen : $b Their historical privilegeStopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
History
British freewomen : $b Their historical privilege
Stopes, C. C. (Charlotte Carmichael)
Women -- Great Britain; Women -- History
For many years these readings remained in uncontested force, not without
protest on the part of women and of the friends of justice. In 1851,
Lord Romilly’s Bill, otherwise called Lord Brougham’s Bill, “for
shortening the language of the Acts of Parliament,” was passed. This
decided that the word “man” should always include “woman” except where
otherwise expressly stated. In that year the Earl of Carlisle presented
a Petition drafted at a public meeting in Sheffield for the extension of
the Parliamentary Suffrage to women. Sympathetic minds were stirred by
the great American Convention of the subject, and in the _Westminster
and Foreign Quarterly_, July, 1851, appears the notable article on “The
Enfranchisement of Women,” by Mrs. Mill. “That women have as good a
claim as men have to the suffrage and to be jury, it would be difficult
for any one to deny.” “It is one axiom of English freedom that taxation
and representation always go together; it is another that all persons
must be tried by their peers, yet _both_ are denied to women.” “A reason
must be given why what is permitted to one person is interdicted to
another.” “Far from being _expedient_, the division of mankind into two
castes, one born to rule the other, is an unqualified mischief, a source
of perversion and demoralisation both to the favoured class and to those
at whose expense they are favoured, producing none of the good which it
is the custom to ascribe to it, and forming a bar to any really vital
improvement either in the character or the social condition of the human
race.”
“It is the boast of modern Europeans and Americans that they know and do
many things which their fore-fathers neither knew nor did; it is the
most unquestionable point of their superiority that custom is not now
the tyrant that it formerly was. Yet in this case prejudice appeals to
custom and authority.” “Great thinkers from Plato to Condorcet have made
emphatic protests in favour of the equality of women.” “We deny the
right of any portion of the species to decide for another portion, or
any individual for another individual what is and what is not their
‘proper sphere.’ The proper sphere of all human beings is the largest
and highest they can attain to.”
=The Bill of 1867.= Again the “Representation of the people” came before
the House in 1867. The word “man” was exchanged for “male persons” of
the 1832 Charter. John Stuart Mill redeemed his father’s errors and
moved an Amendment that it should be made expressly to include women.
“We ought not to deny to them what we are conceding to everyone else, a
right to be consulted; of having, what every petty trade or profession
has, a few members who feel specially called on to attend to their
interests, to point out how these interests are affected by law.” “The
want of this protection has affected their interests vitally. The rich
can make private laws unto themselves by settlements, but what of the
poor?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account