Chambers drew shipping with admirable accuracy--there is
ample proof of this in his picture, _Off Portsmouth_ (p. 52)--and knew
the ways of the sea intimately; Stanfield was also an excellent
draughtsman, but on the whole was more artificial than Chambers. Both
men were for some while successful scene painters, and in Stanfield’s
work particularly the influence of the theatre is apparent; there is an
obvious scenic quality in such pictures as the _Entrance to the Zuyder
Zee_ (p. 54) and _The Port of La Rochelle_ (p. 53); and his _Coast
Scene_ (p. 55) is planned and composed with the scene-painter’s feeling
for construction and distribution of detail. But, despite the theatrical
atmosphere of his art, Stanfield’s achievements are not to be despised,
because the foundation of them was sound and the knowledge he displayed
in them was acquired at first hand.
Dyce’s _Pegwell Bay_ (p. 57) is interesting for two reasons, as a
digression by a successful figure painter into open-air work, and as an
illustration of the influence exercised by the Pre-Raphaelite movement
upon the painters of the time. It is an extraordinary piece of precise
statement, photographic in its accuracy, and is painted with a careful
regard for reality that deserves recognition. Indeed, its simple honesty
makes it of more account than such a picture as Cooke’s _Dutch Boats in
a Calm_ (p. 58), which, capable though it is, has more than a suspicion
of artificiality; or than E. T. Crawford’s _Closehauled, Crossing the
Bar_ (p. 59), in which the spirited treatment of the sea is to some
extent discounted by a certain clumsiness in the drawing of the
sailing-boats and by the somewhat mechanical manner in which they are
used to help out the composition. There is artificiality, too, in the
design of Müller’s _Dredging on the Medway_ (p. 60), but it is more
cleverly disguised, and the handling is more accomplished. All three of
these men, however, contributed something to the sequence of paintings
which stands to the credit of the British school, and all were serious
observers of the sea.
So, too, was Copley Fielding, though other subject-matter than the sea
engaged much of his attention. But he spent a good deal of his time on
the coast and used his opportunities there with considerable discretion.
As a result his sea paintings have a sympathetic quality that is
undeniably persuasive, and they derive an additional charm from their
dexterity of brushwork and from their pleasant management of colour and
tone. The _Coast Scene_ (p. 61) represents him well; it is an eminently
skilful technical exercise, and it conveys correctly an impression of
gathering storm and of the force of a rising wind. The suggestion, also,
of cold, gleaming light when the sky is partly veiled by dark clouds is
sufficiently true and is made with due restraint--without that
over-accentuation of tone contrasts which is so apt to destroy breadth
and unity of effect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account