British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIV: July and October, 1871 — John Shaqi
British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIV: July and October, 1871Various
History
British Quarterly Review, American Edition, Vol. LIV: July and October, 1871
Various
English periodicals
The cities of the same province might
be divided into half a dozen classes, each of which had different
degrees of self-government. But there was none in which a man could so
little do what he liked as in modern Paris. M. de Champagny accounts
for this:--
'The liberties of the Roman Empire consisted not in its
laws, but in something greater or less than laws--in facts,
and these facts may be summed up in one. The art of
government was not then brought to perfection as it is now.
There was more freedom because there was less civilization.
Not to say that Cæsar had neither telegraphs nor railroads,
he had not even any system of administration. This was his
first want. He had no hierarchy of functionaries, depending
upon each other, each subject to be promoted or dismissed
by some other, or by the common master.... Then (a second
want), he neither had nor could have a police; all he had
was a set of volunteer spies, called _delators_,
inconvenient and even dangerous instruments. The heart of
Tiberius would have bounded at the very idea of a great
system of administrative _délation_ and _espionage_ [thank
God English writers are compelled to use Latin or French
words to express a thought so foreign to our manners]
organised from above, and extending its branches everywhere
below, such as that for which I believe we are indebted to
M. de Sartines.[2] His heart would have bounded, but his
purse would have failed, for (his third want) Cæsar had no
budget. The art of finance was in its infancy. Those vast
regions, on an average as rich as they are now, and which
now pay to their actual sovereigns, without much complaint,
at least two hundred millions sterling, did not produce to
Cæsar sixteen millions sterling, and inasmuch as the
contributions which produced these sixteen millions had to
pass through the hands of some fifty thousand publicans and
agents of finance, the contributors, who paid perhaps twice
as much as the Emperor received, cried out fearfully.
Lastly, if Cæsar, wishing to compel his people, had brought
on any serious rising, he would have had no means of
putting it down, for (a fourth want) Cæsar, having no
budget, had no army. Those countries, which now furnish not
less than three millions of soldiers, in those days,
without being much less populous than they are now, did not
furnish more than 300,000 men, and these 300,000 were
absorbed by the guard on the frontiers. There were whole
provinces without a single soldier. This Empire, without
administration, without police, without budget, without
army, would make the lowest clerk in the prefecture of
police, the prefecture of the Seine, the offices of the
Minister of War, or the Minister of Finance, shrug his
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account