Of course men point to the fact that modern biology is able to bring
about actual and genuine modifications in living creatures. Nothing is
further from my intention than to call in question the facts connected
with breeding. Daily life sufficiently proves them, and the laboratory
demonstrates them under a variety of elegant and surprising forms. But
what does one breed? One breeds peculiar conditions under which some
life-process or other runs its course--never by any means the process
itself--in the selfsame way that the physicist “breeds” the sunbeam as
a spectrum, as a polarised ray, as interference, and so forth. Never
yet has breeding brought about the transmutation of one life-form into
another higher in the scale of being.
Now comes the moment when the evolution theorist plays out his last and
highest trump. “Very good!” he says. “Let it be that in consequence of
our hitherto still defective technique we have not yet succeeded in
transmuting one species into a higher, nevertheless, in the facts that
have been grouped together under the name of the fundamental biogenetic
law and in rudimentary formations, Nature shows us that she herself has
actually come this way.”
Of a surety the Buddha knew of no fundamental biogenetic law, probably
also had no idea of so-called rudimentary formations; but I simply
cannot imagine anything that more conclusively proves the truth of
his thought than these same facts. For, to him who has learned of
the Buddha, these facts do not say that which the modern biologist
imputes to them; they testify to the existence of _actual_ associations
between living beings right down into what we call the lowest stages.
They bring immediately before our eyes the competency of human Kamma
to find foothold outside the human kingdom also. As a traveller bears
about with him this and the other trace of the dirt of the roads along
which he has journeyed, so does the embryo in the various stages of
its development exhibit the traces of Samsāra, demonstrate its power
to take hold in the heights and in the deeps, exactly according as its
Kamma is attuned, and demonstrate also that it _has taken_ hold in the
heights and deeps, exactly according as its Kamma _was_ attuned. The
embryonal forms show--to use the language of physics--the tremendous
amplitude of vibration of the _I_-process. They show _that we all eat
out of the one dish_.
I am quite prepared to find interpretations such as these evoke nothing
but merriment among orthodox men of science. But I address myself as
little to the slaves of science as to the slaves outside it. I address
myself to men who think with sufficient independence and possess
sufficient sense of actuality to allow facts to have unbiassed weight
with them.
The following is also worthy of consideration:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account