The fundamental biogenetic law, as interpreted by Haeckel is a complete
contradiction of the very nature of the theory of Natural Selection.
Like every purely scientific mode of envisaging things, the latter
comes in on an unaccented beat, so to speak. It starts out with a given
difference of potentiality, with respect to which one does nothing
but observe the symptoms furnished by the process of compensation;
refraining, however, from every interpretation of how these differences
could ever have arisen. In the interpretation of the evolutionist, on
the other hand, the facts upon which the fundamental biogenetic law
is based of necessity point in the direction of a first beginning;
they converge upon the idea of the “setting in of life.” Hence they
constrain to a scientific form of faith, which necessitates acrimonious
warfare against the church-form of the same, if one cannot agree that
the primordial cell, existing all complete, and the “In the beginning
God created the heaven and the earth,” may be regarded simply as
different attempts at the definition of one and the same occurrence.
It is the feud betwixt dog and wolf. In the dusk they might pass for
mates, were it not that each is busy trying to take a bite out of the
other’s throat. But, like all atheists from the most ancient times,
modern monism, too, forgets that to challenge the _bon dieu_ to single
combat is, as politicians would say, to “recognize him in principle,”
and that at bottom this duel can be nothing but a _modus vivendi_ for
both parties.
Darwin’s original position entirely obviates such a strait as this. It
is, as all science should be, strictly a-moral. With disconcerting--or
if one likes, refreshing--coolness, the biological pieces are set up on
the cosmic chess-board, and a game begun. The first move of the opening
is already made, and now move after move follows of simple necessity.
Where, for example, Darwin speaks of the cuckoo’s instinct, he makes no
attempt to account for the same by itself. He rather begins, “Now let
us suppose that the ancient progenitor of our European cuckoo had the
habits of the American cuckoo, and that she occasionally laid an egg in
another bird’s nest ...” and so on;[26] which simply means: the game is
already in full swing, and so one move follows from the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account