In connection with such a beginningless integration and disintegration,
to speak of a condition of greater or lesser development is the
notion of a child. As little as the clenched fist is more developed
than the five fingers outspread, just as little is a world in space
peopled with thinking, living beings more developed than one spread
out in masses of nebula; all things are only phases in a beginningless
proceeding here presenting itself to me symptomatically, but of which
I obtain a direct comprehension in consciousness. To ask whether suns
and Milky Ways are without beginning is meaningless; for they are
positively nothing else but the expression of the hither and thither
movement of energies; but that which I now experience in consciousness,
that is--rightly considered--beginninglessness itself; and the
self-integration and self-disintegration of worlds is nothing but the
functional concomitant phenomenon of the beginninglessness of the _I_.
If now such a Lokadhātu (world-system) goes to decay, this, conformable
to its nature, is nothing but a summation of single dyings. The Kamma
of the single things takes fresh hold in the universe there where it
can take hold--and therefore _must_ take hold. Actual energies take
hold immediately, independent of space and time. There is no need to
trace their course from meteorites and cosmic nebulæ, from one heavenly
body to another, somewhat as one might trace a letter from its place
of postage to its destination; but even as our thoughts are immediate,
independent of time and space, as our loves are able to “lay hold” in
the remotest ends of the earth, so do the Kammas lay hold immediately,
independent of time and space, in the most distant abysses of
infinitude, even to where no light-year any more can measure--lay hold
there, whither, in virtue of their propensities, their tendencies, they
reach out.
From the commanding position of such a conception it follows that
Buddhist cosmogony does not fit in with our crude astronomical
ideas. As it is not always the case that “birds of a feather flock
together”--there are solitary denizens of air, noble creatures that
wing their way through the ether alone--so Buddhist cosmogony makes
mention of solitary beings who segregate themselves at the initial
beginnings of a new world.
When, after the break-up of a system of worlds, here and there worlds
again begin to form, to sprout; when again here and there energies take
hold even because they can take hold, then these beings appear as pure
creatures of light, self-luminous, wheeling through boundless space,
through boundless epochs of time, compact all of light, compact all of
bliss, yet even as we, belonging to the world, differing only in the
circumstances and antecedent conditions of their “taking hold.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account