The passions which the war has engendered are only partly due to
lust for territorial aggrandisement. Mere thirst after conquest
would have never produced such perversions of moral sense had it
not been backed by the sentiment of fear and jealousy. This is
clearly proved by the fact that feelings have reached their
highest point of intensity where this latter element loomed
largest. The Bulgarians have exhibited a degree of self-control
which is in marked contrast with the conduct of other Allies.
This equanimity is the more surprising in view of the fact that
the position of Bulgaria is well-nigh desperate. For months
past, the brunt of the war has fallen almost entirely on her. On
every side she is surrounded by an atmosphere of open hostility.
By threats of invasion, Roumania has wrung from her a ransom for
the Balkan victories, while in Macedonia her allies are
preparing to dispute her lawful share and have massed against
her their whole armies. So long as peace with Turkey is not
signed she must remain immobilised in front of Chatalja and
Bulair. For a parallel case one must go back to the dark hours
of Prussia during the Seven Years' War. But in the midst of all
these difficulties Bulgaria has kept a cool head, whereas public
opinion in Servia and Greece has parted company with all
reason. It is not indifference to the issues at stake which
explains this placid demeanour. When the proper time arrives,
the Bulgarians will be found tough bargainers and determined to
claim their full due. They know, however, that the position of
their country as prime factor in the Balkans cannot be seriously
affected by the results of the allotment. Even before the war,
the supremacy of Bulgaria was hardly questioned, and the
formation of the Balkan League would have been impossible but
for this acquiescence in her right to leadership. With the
disappearance of Turkey, this predominance is bound to be
further accentuated and henceforth will have to be reckoned with
as a political axiom.
The reasons which have enabled Bulgaria to envisage the future
with tranquillity are for her allies a source of uneasiness.
Servia and Greece have long watched the rapid and uninterrupted
progress of their pushful neighbour with mixed feelings of fear
and envy. Her seniors in point of time, they have been
outdistanced in the race for Balkan hegemony. In 1885 Servia
made a desperate attempt at grappling with the problem, but had
no reason to be satisfied with the results. The doctrine of
Balkan equilibrium was buried at Slivnitza, and since then
Servia has had to rest contented with a secondary place. But the
galling memory of defeat had never died out and probably plays
in the present anti-Bulgarian agitation a larger part than most
Servians realise or would care to admit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account