_Tell Defenneh_, the Biblical Tahpanhes.--In June 1886 Mr Flinders
Petrie had the felicity to discover “Pharaoh’s House,” to which
Jeremiah was brought, after the calamities in Judea, and where he hid
the great stones, as a symbolical act, in the mortar of the brickwork.
It lies in the sandy desert bordering on Lake Menzaleh, about two
days’ journey from San, some hours distant on the one hand from the
cultivated Delta, and on the other hand from the Suez Canal. Here in
the midst of the plain are the brick ruins of a large building; and on
the first evening of his arrival in the district Mr Petrie heard to his
surprise that the building was known as the _Kasr el Bint el Yehudi_,
or the Palace of the Jew’s daughter. Obviously this might refer to
the daughter of King Zedekiah who accompanied Jeremiah in his exile;
and there could now be no doubt that Defenneh represented the ancient
Daphnai and Tahpanhes. It was a frontier fortress or advanced post, to
guard the great highway into Syria.
By the associations of Tahpanhes we are at once carried to Scripture.
“The children of Noph and Tahpanhes have broken the crown of thy head”
(Jer. ii. 16). This was after the slaying of Josiah, the deposition
of Jehoahaz, the setting up of the tributary Jehoiakim, and the
removal of Jehoahaz into Egypt--events which marked the first period
of intercourse between Jews and Greeks. “This intercourse, however,
was soon to be increased; three years later, Nebuchadnezzar invaded
Judea, and all who fled from the war would arrive at Tahpanhes in
their flight into Egypt, and most likely stop there. In short, during
all the troubles and continual invasions and sieges of Jerusalem, in
B.C. 607, B.C. 603, and B.C. 599 (in which a wholesale deportation of
the people took place), and, above all, in the final long siege and
destruction of 590-588 B.C., when “the city was broken up,” and all the
men of war fled, every one who sought to avoid the miseries of war, or
who was politically obnoxious, would naturally flee down into Egypt.
Such refugees would necessarily reach the frontier fort on the caravan
road, and would there find a mixed and mainly foreign population,
Greek, Phœnician, and Egyptian, among whom their presence would not be
resented, as it would be by the still strictly protectionist Egyptians
further in the country. That they should largely, or perhaps mainly
settle there would be the most natural course; they would be tolerated,
they would find a constant communication with their own countrymen, and
they would be as near to Judea as they could in safety remain, while
they awaited a chance of returning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account