Burmah and the BurmeseMackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
History
Burmah and the Burmese
Mackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
Burma -- Civilization; Burma -- History
“Ava and the Burmese empire either held a direct sovereignty or exercised
control over nearly one-half of the vast regions described in maps as
India beyond the Ganges.... By a series of conquests they had overthrown
all the adjacent nations, and had advanced their frontier to the
shores of the Bay of Bengal, and close to the limits of the Company’s
territories. They proved but troublesome and encroaching neighbours.
During Lord Wellesley’s administration, in 1799, when the mass of the
Anglo-Indian army was engaged in the last war against Tippoo Sultaun, the
Burmese made frequent attacks, and were very troublesome on our then weak
eastern frontier.[258] As exclusive and anti-social as the Chinese, and
quite as proud and insolent in their bearing towards foreign envoys, and
foreigners of all classes, it was difficult to establish any intercourse
with them, or to obtain, by pacific representations, any redress of
grievances. Their government, too, was subject to frequent and sanguinary
revolutions, insurrections, and rebellions; one tyrant being murdered,
and succeeded by another.”[259]
In 1795, Symes was deputed to the arrogant Men-ta-ra-gyee, to remonstrate
against the incursions of the Burmese troops. “In 1795,” says Macfarlane,
“a Burmese army of five thousand men pursued three rebellious chiefs,
or, as they termed them (and as they might be), robbers, right into
the English district of Chittagong. A strong detachment was sent from
Calcutta to oppose these Burmese; but the officer in command had orders
to negotiate—not to fight. After some tedious negotiations, which ought
not to have been allowed to occupy a single hour, the violators of our
frontier condescended to agree to retire; and they retired, accordingly,
into their own country. Nor was this all. These three men, who had taken
refuge in our territories, were subsequently given up to the Burmese, and
two out of the three were put to death with atrocious tortures.”[260]
Little, however, came of the colonel’s embassy, “except,” as our
historian goes on to remark,[261] “a very interesting book of travels.”
In the year 1809, a French ship attacked a small island belonging to
the Burmese, and the Golden Foot, not understanding the difference
between French and English,[262] sent a sort of mission to Calcutta
to expostulate against the proceeding, and to demand satisfaction. As
this seemed to open the door of the jealously-guarded court of Ava to
some diplomatic intercourse, Lord Minto despatched Lieutenant Canning
on an embassy. This officer reached Rangoon; and the king of Ava, from
the midst of his white elephants, decreed that the Englishman should be
allowed to proceed to the capital, in all safety and honour; but the
incursions into the Company’s territory at Chittagong of a predatory
tribe of Burmese, called the Mughs, and other untoward events, broke off
an intercourse which never could have promised any very satisfactory
result.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account