Burmah and the BurmeseMackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
History
Burmah and the Burmese
Mackenzie, Kenneth R. H. (Kenneth Robert Henderson)
Burma -- Civilization; Burma -- History
However, let the religion be ancient or modern, in principle it is
one of the best that man ever made for man. Mr. Malcom, from whom
as a missionary one would of course expect rabid intolerance, bears
testimony to this:—“There is scarcely a principle, or precept, in the
Bedagat, which is not found in the Bible. Did the people but act up
to its principles of peace and love, oppression and injury would be
known no more within their borders. Its deeds of merit are in all cases
either really beneficial to mankind, or harmless. It has no mythology of
obscene and ferocious deities; no sanguinary or impure observances; no
self-inflicted tortures; no tyrannizing priesthood; no confounding of
right and wrong, by making certain iniquities laudable in worship. In its
moral code, its descriptions of the purity and peace of the first ages,
of the shortening of man’s life because of its sins, &c., it seems to
have followed genuine traditions. In almost every respect it seems to be
the best religion which man has ever invented.”[130]
It is true there is another side to the picture; but why should we turn
the face to the wall, and expose the tattered back? Let us leave it as
it is, but let us recollect that the ill side is there, and make the
recollection atone for many faults in the character of the worshippers of
Buddha.
CHAPTER IV.
Language—Literature—Manuscripts—The
Aporazabon—Superstitions—Divination—The
Deitton—Astronomy—Division of time.
Of a literature and language so little known as that of Burmah, a notice,
of course, can but be brief. The few particulars with which we are
acquainted, I will, however, offer to the reader.
The sacred books are in a language usually called Pali, which
denomination, Mr. Wilson contends, should only be applied to the
character. He proposes that the name of the language should be Magadeh or
Puncrit, corresponding to the terms Magari and Sanscrit. He informs us,
also, that the language differs from Sanscrit in enunciation only, being
softer, and liquifying all the harsh sounds.[131] With this language we
have but little to do, as it is only the language of the priests, and not
that of the whole population. A grammar of the Pali has been published at
Colombo, with a vocabulary attached.[132]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account