Hebrew literature -- History and criticism; Jewish literature -- History and criticism; Jews in literature
“As to offending powers divine,”
The culprit cried,--“be nothing said:
Yours is a deeper guilt than mine.
I took a portion from the head
Of the King’s image; you, oh fearful odds!
Strike the whole head at once from God’s!”
One wonders whether the author had ever heard of the closely parallel
idea of the ancient Rabbi, who denounced the murderer as one who
diminished the divine image in which man had been made. Observe,
however, how Horace Smith refrains from making cheap capital out of
the joke by describing the offender as a Jew. Smith knew the truth too
well. He knew that, though some Jews were given to coin-clipping, there
were many offenders who were not Jews. It is absolutely characteristic
of Horace Smith that he should have refrained from libelling all Jews
for the sins of some.
Horace Smith was, as already suggested, actuated in his philo-Semitism
by knowledge. And this is the reason why, though his brother James
wrote some of the best of the parodies in _Rejected Addresses_, this
present article deals less with him than with Horace. For that the
latter knew and understood Judaism can be demonstrated by the clearest
evidence. In 1831 he published a prose volume, which ought to be better
known to English Jews than it is. The title is “Festivals, Games, and
Amusements, Ancient and Modern.” The second chapter deals with the
ancient Jews. It reveals an almost perfect insight into the Jewish
conception of life. Only one or two passages require amendment to make
it quite perfect. I need not expound, it will suffice to quote a single
passage:
“It is worthy of remark that the government he (Moses) established, the
only one claiming a divine author, was founded on the most democratical
and even levelling principles. It was a theocratical commonwealth,
having the Deity Himself for its King. Agriculture was the basis of
the Mosaic polity; all the husbandsmen were on a footing of perfect
equality; riches conferred no permanent preeminence; there was neither
peasantry nor nobility, unless the Levites may be considered a sort
of priestly aristocracy, for they were entitled by their birth to
certain privileges. But this is foreign to our purpose. The most
distinguishing features of the government were the vigilant, the most
anxious provisions made for the interests, enjoyments, and festivals of
the nation; and that enlarged wisdom and profound knowledge of human
nature, which led the inspired founder of the Hebrew commonwealth to
exalt and sanctify the pleasures of the people by uniting them with
religion, while he confirmed and endeared religion by combining it with
all the popular gratifications.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account