C. Sallusti Crispi De Bello Catilinario Et JugurthinoSallust
History
C. Sallusti Crispi De Bello Catilinario Et Jugurthino
Sallust
Jugurthine War, 111-105 B.C.; Rome -- History -- Conspiracy of Catiline, 65-62 B.C.
[319] 'There they exerted themselves most actively,' _eo_ having the
meaning of _eo loco_, or _ibi_.
[320] 'More upon themselves than upon others.' See Zumpt, S 725.
[321] 'One might observe them.' Zumpt, S 528, note 2.
[322] _Sicuti--possent_, 'just as if,' as _sicut_, like _quasi_, is used
for _velut_. See chap. 31. For it is not possible that the two places
of the struggle, near the walls of Zama, and on the other side of the
Roman camp, should have been so near that the men could hear one
another, or even distinctly see the separate charges.
[323] _Niti corporibus_, 'to exert one's self bodily,' inasmuch as the
body of the combatants is sometimes moved forward, and sometimes
backward. The plural _corpora_ is as common in Latin as _animi_, when
several persons are spoken of.
[324] _Sine tumultu_, 'without disturbance' or 'hindrance.'
[325] _Astrictus_, 'fixed intent,' whose attention was entirely directed
to the contest at a distance. _Occupatis_ also might have been used.
61. Metellus, postquam videt frustra inceptum neque oppidum capi, neque
Jugurtham nisi ex insidiis aut suo loco pugnam facere, et jam aestatem
exactam esse, ab Zama discedit et in iis urbibus, quae ad se[326]
defecerant, satisque munitae loco aut moenibus erant, praesidia imponit;
ceterum exercitum in provinciam, quae proxima est Numidiae, hiemandi
gratia collocat. Neque id tempus ex aliorum more quieti aut luxuriae
concedit, sed quoniam armis bellum parum procedebat, insidias regi per
amicos tendere et eorum perfidia pro armis uti parat. Igitur Bomilcarem,
qui Romae cum Jugurtha fuerat et inde vadibus datis clam Massivae de nece
judicium fugerat, quod ei per maximam amicitiam maxima copia fallendi
erat, multis pollicitationibus aggreditur. Ac primo efficit, uti ad se
colloquendi gratia occultus veniat, dein fide data, si Jugurtham vivum
aut necatum sibi tradidisset, fore, ut illi senatus impunitatem et sua
omnia concederet, facile Numidae persuadet, cum ingenio infido,[327] tum
metunti, ne, si pax cum Romanis fieret, ipse per condiciones ad
supplicium traderetur.
[326] _Ad eum_, or _ad illum_, would have been strictly grammatical; and
as Sallust uses _ad se_, it would have been more consistent to use
the subjunctive _defecissent_; but the indicative is necessary,
because a fact is to be expressed. All doubts would have been removed
by _ad ipsum_, for this pronoun would turn our attention away from
the secondary subject, _urbes_, and direct it to the leading subject,
Metellus. But the ancient authors do not very often use this pronoun
where _is_ or _sui_, _sibi_, _se_, can be employed. Compare chap. 66,
and Zumpt, S 550.
[327] That is, _Bomilcar ingenio infidus erat et metuebat_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account