C. Sallusti Crispi De Bello Catilinario Et JugurthinoSallust
History
C. Sallusti Crispi De Bello Catilinario Et Jugurthino
Sallust
Jugurthine War, 111-105 B.C.; Rome -- History -- Conspiracy of Catiline, 65-62 B.C.
15. Postquam rex finem loquendi fecit, legati Jugurthae, largitione magis
quam causa freti, paucis respondent: 'Hiempsalem ob saevitiam suam ab
Numidis interfectum; Adherbalem ultro bellum inferentem, postquara
superatus sit, queri, quod injuriam facere nequivisset: Jugurtham ab
senatu petere, ne se alium putarent, ac Numantiae cognitus esset, neu
verba inimici ante facta sua ponerent.'[113] Deinde utrique curia
egrediuntur. Senatus statim consulitur: fautores legatorum, praeterea
magna pars gratia depravata,[114] Adherbalis dicta contemnere, Jugurthae
virtutem extollere laudibus; gratia, voce, denique omnibus modis pro
alieno scelere et flagitio sua quasi pro gloria nitebantur. At contra
pauci, quibus bonum et aequum divitiis carius erat, subveniundum
Adherbali et Hiempsalis mortem severe vindicandam censebant; sed ex
omnibus maxime Aemelius Scaurus, homo nobilis, impiger, factiosus, avidus
potentiae, honoris, divitiarum, ceterum vitia sua callide occultans. Is
postquam videt regis largitionem famosam impudentemque, veritus, quod in
tali re solet, ne polluta licentia[115] invidiam accenderet, animum a
consueta libidine continuit.
[113] _Ante facta_, &c. It would have been more common to say _factis
suis anteponerent_. In Cicero, _ante_ is not used to denote
preference as in Sallust, _Cat._ 53: _Graeci ante Romanos fuere_ for
_Graeci Romanis praestabant_.
[114] According to Sallust's mode of speaking, we should have expected
_depravati_, _pars_ being only another form for _alii_. But nothing
can be said against the grammatical agreement _pars depravata_, it
being that form which, according to grammar, should be used.
[115] Scaurus dreaded the stained audacity of those who accepted bribes
from Jugurtha without any scruple or shame, and would have liked to
stir up against them the hatred and envy of others. _Licentia_ is the
conduct of a man who thinks he is allowed to do anything, and
accordingly here signifies to accept bribes by which statesmen
disgrace themselves. The adjective which properly refers to men
(_pollutus_) is here transferred to _licentia_. Sallust describes
Aemelius Scaurus, one of the most eminent men of his age (he was
twice consul and princeps senatus), as a prudent aristocrat, anxious
to keep up a respectable appearance, and to avoid suspicion as much
as possible; although in secret he, too, had recourse to unfair means
to obtain influence and wealth. The events which Sallust has related
hitherto, the murder of Hiempsal, the expulsion of Adherbal by
Jugurtha, and Adherbal's flight to Rome, belong to the year B.C. 116,
a time when, if we except some trifling wars against barbarous tribes
on the frontiers, the Roman Republic was not engaged in any military
undertaking.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account