Callinicus : $b A defence of chemical warfare — John Shaqi
Callinicus : $b A defence of chemical warfareHaldane, J. B. S. (John Burdon Sanderson)
Philosophy
Callinicus : $b A defence of chemical warfare
Haldane, J. B. S. (John Burdon Sanderson)
Chemical warfare; Gases, Asphyxiating and poisonous -- War use
To see how chemical weapons are likely to be used in future we must
study their employment in the late war. Lachrymatory gas was only once
used under ideal conditions――by the Germans in the Argonne in 1915.
They captured a fairly extensive French trench system and about 2,400
prisoners, almost all unwounded, but temporarily blind. When they
gave the number of prisoners, the French authorities not unnaturally
protested that this number was practically equal to the total of their
casualties. And this was quite true. The French were unprotected. They
were deluged with shells giving off a vapour which temporarily blinded
them. They could not even run away. The Germans walked across, removed
their rifles, and formed them up in columns which marched back, each
led by a German in goggles. In order to make future wars humane it
would only be necessary to introduce the two following rules:――
1. No goggles or other eye protection shall be worn;
2. No shells shall be used containing any other substances save
ethyl iodo-acetate (or other lachrymatory compound) and a small
bursting charge.
Certainly it is unlikely that such rules will ever be adopted, but I
do contend that to forbid the use of such substances is a piece of
sentimentalism as cruel as it is ridiculous.
Gases of the first group were used in clouds discharged from cylinders,
sometimes on a front of several miles. They probably caused at least
20,000 casualties among unprotected or inadequately protected British
troops. At least a quarter of these died, and that very painfully, in
many cases after a struggle for breath lasting several days. On the
other hand, of those who did not die almost all recovered completely,
and the symptoms of the few who became permanent invalids were mainly
nervous. Apart, however, from the extreme terror and agitation produced
by the gassing of uneducated people, I regard the type of wound
produced by the average shells as, on the whole, more distressing than
the pneumonia caused by chlorine or phosgene. Besides being wounded,
I have been buried alive, and on several occasions in peacetime I
have been asphyxiated to the point of unconsciousness. The pain and
discomfort arising from the other experiences were utterly negligible
compared with those produced by a good septic shell-wound.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account