France -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
I liked him very much, only in my liking for him there was lacking the
element of tenderness, of kindliness; I liked him with a sort of fear
and uneasiness, with a painful feeling that in his presence I did not
amount to much and that I was eclipsed, so to speak, by the grandeur of
his genius.... I liked him as one likes the sea, the tempest, as one
likes some immense force of nature. Lirat inspired me with fear, his
presence paralyzed what little intellectual powers there were in me,
for I was always afraid that I might say something foolish at which
he would jeer. He was so severe, so relentless to everybody; he knew
so well how to discover, to reveal the ridiculous side in artists,
in writers whom I considered superior to myself, and to characterize
them by some apt remark unforgettable and fierce, that in his presence
I found myself in a state of constant mistrust, of ever present
disquietude. I always asked myself: "What does he think of me? What
scornful thoughts do I inspire in him?"
I had that feminine curiosity which obsessed me to know what opinion
he had of me. By means of distant allusions, absurd affections or
hypocritical circumlocutions, I would sometimes try to surprise or
provoke him into frankness, and I suffered even more when he deigned to
pay me a curt compliment, as one who throws a few pennies to a pauper
whom one wishes to be rid of; at least, that is what I imagined. In a
word, I liked him very much, I assure you; I was very much devoted to
him, but in this affection and in this devotion there was an element
of uncertainty, which destroyed the charm of those feelings; there was
also a certain grudge which rendered those feelings almost painful, a
grudge caused by the sense of my inferiority. Never, not even when I
was most intimate with him, was I able to conquer that feeling of base
and timid pride, never could I enjoy a friendship which I prized very
highly. Lirat, on the other hand, was simple in his relations with me,
often affectionate, sometimes "fatherly" in his attentions, and of all
his friends, who were very few in number, I was the only one whose
companionship he sought.
Like all those who hold tradition in contempt, like all who rebel
against the prejudices of conventional education, against the idiotic
formulae of the School, Lirat was very much discussed; spoken of
with contempt--I should rather say. It must be stated also that his
conception of free and lofty art conflicted with all the professed
conventions and accepted ideas, and that by their forceful synthesis
and prodigious knowledge of life which obscured his craftsmanship, his
works of art disconcerted the lovers of prettiness and grace and of the
frigid correctness of academic unity. The return of modern painting to
the great gothic art--this they could never forgive him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account