Cambridge (England) -- History; University of Cambridge -- History
"The assumption of priests' orders was indeed made, in most
instances, an indispensable condition for a permanent tenure of a
Fellowship, but it too often only served as a pretext under which
all obligation to studious research was ignored, while the
Fellowship itself again too often enabled the holder to evade with
equal success the responsibilities of parish work. Down to a
comparatively recent date, it has accordingly been the accepted
theory with respect to nearly all College Fellowships that they are
designed to assist clergymen to prepare for active pastoral work,
and not to aid the cause of learned or scientific research.
Occasionally, it is true, the bestowal of a lay fellowship has
fallen upon fruitful ground. The Plumian Professorship fostered the
bright promise of a Cotes: the Lucasian sustained the splendid
achievements of Newton. But for the most part those labours to
which Cambridge can point with greatest pride and in whose fame she
can rightly claim to share--the untiring scientific investigations
which have established on a new and truer basis the classification
of organic existence or the succession of extinct forms--or the
long patience and profound calculations which have wrested from the
abysmal depths of space the secrets of stupendous agencies and
undreamed of laws--or the scholarship which has restored, with a
skill and a success that have moved the envy of united Germany,
some of the most elaborate creations of the Latin muse--have been
the achievements of men who have yielded indeed to the traditional
theory a formal assent but have treated it with a virtual
disregard."[91]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account