Cambridge (England) -- History; University of Cambridge -- History
"Our founder's object I conceive to have been to secure for his own
order in the Church, for the secular priesthood, the academical
benefit which the religious orders were so largely enjoying, and to
this end I think all his provisions are found to be consistently
framed. He borrowed from the monastic institutions the idea of an
aggregate body living by common rule, under a common head, provided
with all things needful for a corporate and perpetual life, fed by
its secured endowments, fenced from all external interference,
except that of its lawful patron; but after borrowing thus much, he
differenced his institution by giving his beneficiaries quite a
distinct employment, and keeping them free from all those perpetual
obligations which constituted the essence of the religious life....
His beneficiaries are from the first designated as _Scholares in
scholis degentes_; their employment was study, not what was
technically called "the religious life" (_i.e._ the life of a
monk).... He forbade his scholars even to take vows, they were to
keep themselves free of every other institution, to render no one
else's _obsequium_. He looked forward to their going forth to
labour _in seculo_, and acquiring preferment and property.... Study
being the function of the inmates of his house, their time was not
to be taken up by ritual or ceremonial duties, for which special
chaplains were appointed; neither was it to be bestowed on any
handicrafts, as in some monastic orders. Voluntary poverty was not
enjoined, though poor circumstances were a qualification for a
fellowship. No austerity was required, though contentment with
simple fare was enforced as a duty, and the system of enlarging the
number of inmates according to the means of the house was framed to
keep the allowance to each at the very moderate rate which the
founder fixed. The proofs of his design to benefit the Church
through a better educated secular priesthood are to be found, not
in the letter of their statutes, but in the tenour of their
provisions, especially as to studies, in the direct averments of
some of the subsidiary documents, in the fact of his providing
Church patronage as part of his system, and in the readiness of
prelates and chapters to grant him impropriation of the rectorial
endowments of the Church."
Such was the _Regula Mertonensis_, the Rule of Merton, as it came to be
called, which served as the model for so many subsequent statutes.
This _Regula_ Hugh de Balsham, Bishop of Ely (1257-1286), evidently had
before him, when some twenty years after his consecration to the
bishopric, he proceeded, by giving a new form to an earlier benefaction
of his own, to open a new chapter in the history of the University of
Cambridge.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account