Moxon was speaking with unusual animation and earnestness. As he paused
I heard in an adjoining room known to me as his “machine-shop,” which no
one but himself was permitted to enter, a singular thumping sound, as of
some one pounding upon a table with an open hand. Moxon heard it at the
same moment and, visibly agitated, rose and hurriedly passed into the
room whence it came. I thought it odd that any one else should be in
there, and my interest in my friend—with doubtless a touch of
unwarrantable curiosity—led me to listen intently, though, I am happy to
say, not at the keyhole. There were confused sounds, as of a struggle or
scuffle; the floor shook. I distinctly heard hard breathing and a hoarse
whisper which said “Damn you!” Then all was silent, and presently Moxon
reappeared and said, with a rather sorry smile:
“Pardon me for leaving you so abruptly. I have a machine in there that
lost its temper and cut up rough.”
Fixing my eyes steadily upon his left cheek, which was traversed by four
parallel excoriations showing blood, I said:
“How would it do to trim its nails?”
I could have spared myself the jest; he gave it no attention, but seated
himself in the chair that he had left and resumed the interrupted
monologue as if nothing had occurred:
“Doubtless you do not hold with those (I need not name them to a man of
your reading) who have taught that all matter is sentient, that every
atom is a living, feeling, conscious being. _I_ do. There is no such
thing as dead, inert matter: it is all alive; all instinct with force,
actual and potential; all sensitive to the same forces in its environment
and susceptible to the contagion of higher and subtler ones residing in
such superior organisms as it may be brought into relation with, as those
of man when he is fashioning it into an instrument of his will. It
absorbs something of his intelligence and purpose—more of them in
proportion to the complexity of the resulting machine and that of its
work.
“Do you happen to recall Herbert Spencer’s definition of ‘Life’? I read
it thirty years ago. He may have altered it afterward, for anything I
know, but in all that time I have been unable to think of a single word
that could profitably be changed or added or removed. It seems to me not
only the best definition, but the only possible one.
“‘Life,’ he says, ‘is a definite combination of heterogeneous changes,
both simultaneous and successive, in correspondence with external
coexistences and sequences.’”
“That defines the phenomenon,” I said, “but gives no hint of its cause.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account