All accounts agree in affirming that this part of the Cape was
_comparatively_ well wooded a century ago. But notwithstanding the
great changes which have taken place in these respects, I cannot but
think that we must make some allowance for the greenness of the
Pilgrims in these matters, which caused them to see green. We do not
believe that the trees were large or the soil was deep here. Their
account may be true particularly, but it is generally false. They saw
literally, as well as figuratively, but one side of the Cape. They
naturally exaggerated the fairness and attractiveness of the land, for
they were glad to get to any land at all after that anxious voyage.
Everything appeared to them of the color of the rose, and had the scent
of juniper and sassafras. Very different is the general and off-hand
account given by Captain John Smith, who was on this coast six years
earlier, and speaks like an old traveller, voyager, and soldier, who
had seen too much of the world to exaggerate, or even to dwell long, on
a part of it. In his “Description of New England,” printed in 1616,
after speaking of Accomack, since called Plymouth, he says: “Cape Cod
is the next presents itself, which is only a headland of high hills of
sand, overgrown with shrubby pines, _hurts_ [i.e. whorts, or
whortleberries], and such trash, but an excellent harbor for all
weathers. This Cape is made by the main sea on the one side, and a
great bay on the other, in form of a sickle.” Champlain had already
written, “Which we named _Cap Blanc_ (Cape White), because they were
sands and downs (_sables et dunes_) which appeared thus.”
When the Pilgrims get to Plymouth their reporter says again, “The land
for the crust of the earth is a spit’s depth,”—that would seem to be
their recipe for an earth’s crust,—“excellent black mould and fat in
some places.” However, according to Bradford himself, whom some
consider the author of part of “Mourt’s Relation,” they who came over
in the _Fortune_ the next year were somewhat daunted when “they came
into the harbor of Cape Cod, and there saw nothing but a naked and
barren place.” They soon found out their mistake with respect to the
goodness of Plymouth soil. Yet when at length, some years later, when
they were fully satisfied of the poorness of the place which they had
chosen, “the greater part,” says Bradford, “consented to a removal to a
place called Nausett,” they agreed to remove all together to Nauset,
now Eastham, which was jumping out of the frying-pan into the fire; and
some of the most respectable of the inhabitants of Plymouth did
actually remove thither accordingly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account