The day of the trial was near at hand. Sir John Maxton had had two
interviews with his client. After the second, he called on her.
"I haven't seen you since I met him, have I? Your Sault! What is
he, in the name of heaven? He fascinates me, Beryl, fascinates me!
Sometimes I wish I had never taken the brief--not because of the
hopelessness of it--it _is_ hopeless, you know--but--"
"But?" she repeated, when he paused, puzzling to express himself
clearly.
"He is amazing: I have never met anybody like him. I am not
particularly keen on my fellows, perhaps I know them too well and
have seen too much of their meannesses, their evilness. But Sault is
different. I went to discuss his case and found myself listening to
his views on immortality. He says that what we call immortality can
be reduced to mathematical formulæ. He limited the infinite to a
circle, and convinced me. I felt like a fourth form boy listening to
a 'brain' and found myself being respectful! But it wasn't that--it
was a sweetness, a clearness--something Christlike. Queer thing to
say about a man who has committed two murders, both in cold blood,
but it is a fact. Beryl, it is impossible to save him, it is only
fair to tell you. I cannot help feeling that if we could get at the
character of this man Moropulos, he would have a chance, but he
absolutely refuses to talk of Moropulos. 'I did it,' he says, 'what
is the use? I shot him deliberately. He was drunk: I was in no
danger from him. I shot him because I wanted him to die. When I
walked over to where he lay, he was dead. If he had been alive I
should have shot him again.' What can one do? If he had been
anybody else, I should have retired from the case.
"There is a safe in this case, probably you have read about it in the
newspapers. It was found in the Greek's house, and is a sort of
secret repository. At any rate, it cannot be opened except by
somebody who knows the code word. I suspected Sault of being one who
could unlock the door and challenged him. He did not deny his
knowledge but declined to give me the word. He never lies: if he
says he doesn't know, it is not worth while pressing him because he
really doesn't know. Beryl, would your father have any knowledge of
that safe?"
She shook her head. "It is unlikely, but I will ask him. Father
says that Ronnie is going to the trial. Is he a witness?"
Sir John had, as it happened, seen Ronnie that day and was able to
inform her. "Ronnie is writing the story of the trial for a
newspaper. What has Sault done to him? He is particularly vicious
about him. In a way I can understand the reason if they had ever
met. Sault is the very antithesis of Ronnie. They would 'swear',
like violently different colors. I asked him if he would care to
stay with me--I have had the Kennivens' house placed at my disposal,
they are at Monte Carlo--but he declined with alacrity. Why does he
hate Sault? He says that he is looking forward to the trial."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account