Capturing a Locomotive: A History of Secret Service in the Late War.Pittenger, William
History
Capturing a Locomotive: A History of Secret Service in the Late War.
Pittenger, William
Chattanooga Railroad Expedition, 1862; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Campaigns
Colonel Cleiburne had asked permission to remove our irons, and this
being refused, he gave us, on his own responsibility, an inexpressibly
great indulgence. For an hour or two every fine afternoon he ordered the
guards to bring us out into the jail-yard. This was something to look
forward to all the day, and made our second confinement at Chattanooga
far less irksome and prostrating than the first. To simply sit in the
sunlight and watch the clouds drifting in the blue above, or to walk
back and forth watching the lengthening shadows of the mountains, was
intense enjoyment. We will never cease to be grateful to the brave Irish
soldier who secured us these indulgences, which, simple as they were,
had not been expected.
But we felt that the wearing of irons for so long a period was entirely
unnecessary, and set our wits to work for the removal of such needless
incumbrances. One of the party had managed to secrete a small knife in
his sleeve while being searched, and with this he whittled out rude keys
from the bones of the meat given us, which readily unlocked our
handcuffs. The padlocks on the chains were served in a similar manner.
We did not dare to let any one of the guards know of this expedient, or
appear in public in our new liberty, lest more effectual means should be
devised of securing us. To avoid detection while thus unchained we
always kept some one on the watch. When a footstep was heard on the
outside stairway the signal was given, and a quick rattling of chains
accompanied the adjustment and relocking of our bonds. When the door
opened we would appear all properly chained, but when alone we would
soon be free again. This deception was continued as long as we were kept
in irons.
We here took up the amusement of mock trials. Andrews had been tried,
and the remainder of us expected to be, either in a body or singly. This
may have suggested the diversion, which soon became very popular. One of
the company would be charged with some offence, usually a trifling
breach of our self-imposed prison rules. William Campbell, whose immense
personal strength better enabled him to enforce his decisions, usually
officiated as judge, until at last he got the name of "judge" firmly
fixed upon him. We had ample time for this sport, and the opposing
counsel would make very long and learned speeches. So interesting were
these arguments, and so eloquent were our appeals, that no one of the
auditors was ever known to leave the court-room while they were in
progress! The witnesses were very slippery, and it was often difficult
to reconcile their testimony. Some friends of the prisoners nearly
always attempted to resist the laws and prevent the infliction of
penalties, but in such cases the _personal weight_ of the judge decided
the affair. This resistance would give rise to new arrests and trials,
and thus the work became interminable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account