Carranza, Venustiano, 1859-1920; Mexico -- History -- Revolution, 1910-1920; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
The thought was expressed by a great many South American statesmen that
President Wilson’s Mexican policy would be a good illustration of the
future policy towards South America. At the beginning the expressions
of neutrality and non-intervention in the internal affairs of Mexico
were considered rather suspiciously.
Had the President of the United States declared war on Mexico and sent
troops to Mexico City on any pretext whatsoever, the Latin American
nations would have closed their doors to American capital, commerce,
and would have boycotted American goods. The thought would have always
been present that the Americans would always use their interests as a
wedge for interference in their national affairs.
The entrance of Argentina, Brazil and Chile in a solution of the
Mexican-American incident at Tampico was a characteristic move
exemplifying the new trend of thought on statesmanship in Washington.
Under a republican administration, England, France and Germany would
have been asked to settle the question with the United States instead
of the A B C powers. Without fear of contradiction it can be stated
that Argentina, Brazil and Chile’s entrance into Pan American affairs
with the co-operation of the United States proves that the State
Department has finally learned the A B C of Pan American statesmanship.
Likewise, that the Monroe doctrine can only reach its highest
efficiency in co-operation with the whole of America from Patagonia to
Canada.
When the Americans create a Pan American doctrine, then there is no
doubt that Europe will not dare to challenge it.
At present a challenge to the Monroe doctrine is in reality a challenge
to the American navy. With a new Pan American doctrine the challenge
would include all Latin American countries, with the United States
and Canada in an offensive and defensive alliance against one or
more European powers. At present it appears as if the defence of the
territorial integrity of all America was shouldered upon the United
States alone. The Latin Americans feel that they should have a share of
this responsibility, for they believe themselves capable and ready to
do so.
There was a great deal of excitement and indignation in South America
when the American marines landed in Vera Cruz. Huerta was not made more
popular by this incident, but the national instinct of preservation of
the Latin races made them unconsciously understand that the landing of
American blue jackets was only a wedge to achieve American occupation
and that as long as Vera Cruz was occupied, it was only a question of
time until American soldiers would march to Mexico City.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account