Carranza, Venustiano, 1859-1920; Mexico -- History -- Revolution, 1910-1920; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
When Roosevelt was in South America he was fêted and banqueted by the
most prominent men in the A B C republics. They were too polite to
inform him what they thought of his speeches on the Monroe doctrine.
The articles and editorials commenting Roosevelt’s theories were
very plain if courteous: that either Mr. Roosevelt had forgotten the
original meaning of the Monroe doctrine or that he was deceiving
himself into an imperialistic meaning of the doctrine.
The Latin Americans and Mexico hope fervently that the unselfish,
humanitarian and democratic diplomacy of President Wilson will bear the
brunt of the tremendous influences that are brought to bear upon it.
It is a well known platitude that certain American mining, railroad
and oil interests are subterraneously working against this idealistic
policy; that the War Department has been itching for a war of conquest
or police work in Mexico. An officer of the United States army in an
expansive moment volunteered the information that intervention in
Mexico would mean an increase from 80 to 350,000 men in the American
army and make it possible to organize it more in proportion with its
population. That there being always a danger of a war with Japan, and
the United States not being ready for it, a war with Mexico would
prepare the army for that eventuality.
President Wilson has more admirers in Mexico and South America than
any other President or statesman in the whole history of the United
States has ever had, not even excepting the martyr President Lincoln,
or Washington.
The popular thought has been deeply imbedded with the conviction that
if the dictator Huerta could not exasperate and inveigle President
Wilson into a war with Mexico, that no power for evil can achieve the
purpose in the future.
Far seeing Mexicans did not expect a prompt solution of the vital
problems after the elimination of Huerta. The dictator was only the
greatest impedimenta to a realization of liberal ideals; once Huerta
eliminated the work was a little less arduous, but still of tremendous
purport.
The participation of England, France and Germany in a struggle for life
in Europe has luckily relieved Mexico of three great mischief makers.
The great and sombre powers which have kept Mexico in a turmoil for a
hundred years are still at work: the clericals, the landowners and the
militarists; in the last twenty years the American interests have been
added to the list.
A Mexican thinker concreted the thought thus: “The great powers for
evil in Mexico are: The Church, the Latifundiæ and the Trusts; their
great victims will be President Wilson, Carranza and the Mexican
people.”
REFLECTIONS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account