Carranza, Venustiano, 1859-1920; Mexico -- History -- Revolution, 1910-1920; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
It is quite true that the landing of American marines meant
intervention, but President Wilson had declared that it was done
against General Huerta, the Dictator, and not against the Mexican
people; that American soldiers would be satisfied to occupy the Mexican
port until the usurper was driven out.
To make the average Mexican understand this complicated situation,
and to convince the Americans that Carranza’s protest was not only
necessary but was the only manly and patriotic act possible for any
Mexican leader, was the task which befell Sr. Zubáran.
The lifting of the embargo on arms and ammunition at the border,
without arousing the hostility of the War Department in Washington, was
another difficult mission.
To prevent the Mexican constitutionalists from crossing the American
border, thereby playing into the hands of Huerta, was as perilous and
risky a game as putting out a lighted fuse near a powder magazine.
A talented writer and lawyer, Don Luis Cabrera, ably assisted Rafael
Zubáran. The sympathetic attitude of President Wilson and Secretary
Bryan helped to crown the efforts with success. Also, the unofficial
and friendly co-operation of ex-Governor Lind was of incalculable value
to the Mexican diplomats.
But any other less experienced and less discreet personality, a mind
less acute, keen and masterly, would have failed ignominiously.
Americans as well as Mexicans are discovering that diplomatic
victories, although silent and modest, are as effective and useful as
military achievements.
CHAPTER IX
THE CONSTITUTIONALISTS IN PARIS
Although the diplomatic and financial battle for great loans of the
Huerta régime was waged and lost in the United States, as a result of
the attitude of the Wilson administration, Huerta was nevertheless
enabled to make a loan in Wall Street, ostensibly to pay the interest
on the Railroad Merger. The real battle for financial assistance,
however, was fought in Paris.
The Parisian bankers were always favorably inclined to the existing
governments of Mexico. Diaz had always been considered financially
solvent, with Limantour at his side.
The French and English bankers, who had made fortunes on Mexican loans,
always spoke with regret and almost pique at the overthrow of “the
grand old man.” Foreign bankers not being by nature sentimental or
radical, had no sympathy or understanding for the tremendous popular
upheaval in Mexico. The whole great libertarian movement was quite
misunderstood or ignored. The Huerta régime seemed like a reversion
to the good old fat times under Limantour. Huerta exhibited all the
ear-marks of the strong man on horseback. To the superficial bankers,
the Mexican Caracalla was bound to stay and ask for more loans, and
offer more profits.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account