On another occasion he employed a ligature needle of medium size, with
which he pierced the conjunctiva by the side of the worm, and passed it
between the worm and the sclerotic, making it emerge at the opposite
side. By this manœuvre he was able to raise the fold of conjunctiva along
with the worm on the concavity of the needle. This fold he divided, and
drew out the worm without mutilation. The operation required to be done
very quickly, otherwise the worm escaped and disappeared, sometimes
for a very long time. Of five negroes upon whom he thus operated he
was only able to remove the worm twice. The worms were about fifteen
lines in length, and a little less thick than a violin string. He did
not think the worms were a species of dracunculus, for they were quite
white, firmer, and less long in proportion. He never saw the worm make an
opening for itself. In the seven voyages he had made to the Angola coast
he had never seen a negro affected with dracunculus. Other surgeons who
had sailed on these coasts assured him they also had seen no cases, which
made him conclude that the negroes of that country are not subject to
dracunculus. The cases on which he operated were healed in twenty-four
hours.
We next find M. Clot at a meeting of the Académie Royale des Sciences
in December, 1832, referring to the case of a negress, who suffered
from a dracunculus under the conjunctiva of the eye. It appeared now
and then gliding between the conjunctiva and sclerotic, lifting up the
conjunctiva. This case appears to be one that was seen by Dr. Roulin at
Monpox in America.
Another case is mentioned by Dr. Sigaud in his work on the ‘Climate and
Diseases of Brazil.’ He states he was witness in 1833 of the extraction,
by M. dos Santos, of a filaria situated in the orbit on the surface of
the sclerotic of a negress.
In 1838 Dr. Guyon made an interesting communication to the French Academy
of Sciences, in which he narrated the case of a young negress affected
with two filariæ, one in the right and the other in the left eye, but
occasionally both appeared in the same eye; the passage of the worm
from the one eye to the other occurring with great rapidity through the
cellular tissue under the skin at the root of the nose. The filariæ were
in different eyes when the operator (Dr. Blot of Martinique) extracted
the filaria from the left. Some hours after, when he returned to extract
the other worm, he found that it had passed to the left eye, from which
he extracted it by a fresh incision.
The first cases reported by an English surgeon were by Dr. Loney, a naval
surgeon, occurring in two Kroomen, whom he saw while cruising on the West
Coast of Africa during 1841-2. In both he succeeded in extracting the
parasite.[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account