Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales — John Shaqi
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
This was sent to Lord Palmerston by Lord John Russell, and it was
acknowledged by Lord Palmerston as follows:--"I have taken a copy of this
memorandum of the Queen's, and will not fail to attend to the directions
which it contains." This occurred in August, 1850, more than twelve months
before the occurrence of the _coup d'état_ in Paris, and in the interval
Palmerston, with difficulty dissuaded from receiving Kossuth who was on
a visit to England, accepted an address from the Radicals of Islington
in which the Emperors of Russia and Austria were stigmatised as despots,
tyrants, and assassins. A few days later he committed a fresh indiscretion
in conversation with Count Walewski, the French Ambassador, to whom he
expressed a strong approval of the _coup d'état_. When Palmerston was
asked to explain his conduct, he evaded the point by a long defence of
the action of Louis Napoleon, and Lord John Russell at last summoned up
courage to dismiss him from his office.
Soon after the opening of Parliament in 1852, Lord John Russell related
to the House what had happened in connection with this matter. Our
Ambassador in France had been instructed to abstain from all interference
with the internal affairs of that country. Lord Palmerston was alleged
to have held a conversation with the French Ambassador inconsistent with
those instructions. The Premier wrote to him on the subject, but his
inquiries had for some days been met with a disdainful silence; Lord
Palmerston having meanwhile, without the knowledge of his colleagues,
written a despatch, containing instructions to Lord Normanby, who had
previously been advised to observe a strict neutrality, which Lord John
Russell considered was putting himself in the place of the Crown and
passing by the Crown; while he gave the moral approbation of England to
the acts of the President of the Republic, in direct opposition to the
policy which the Government had hitherto pursued. In these circumstances
Lord John said he had no other alternative but to declare, that while he
was Prime Minister Lord Palmerston could not hold the seals of office. The
noble Foreign Secretary had been accordingly dismissed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account