Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
The first movement of France in this Eastern Question was made in 1850.
The Latin priests in Jerusalem were always clamouring against their
rivals, and a fresh complaint reaching Paris, the Prince-President
directed his ambassador at the Porte, General Aupick, to claim the
fulfilment of a treaty in favour of the Latin Church, obtained in
1740. The gist of the grievance was that, by Russian influence, and by
degrees, the Greeks had gained possession of certain churches and other
holy places, in contravention of this treaty, and by the connivance of
the Porte. And it was natural that as, since 1740, Russia had exercised
a greater pressure on the Porte than France, so she had brought it to
bear to exact concessions in favour of the priests of her faith, and
give them a predominance at the holy shrines. For a century France had
acquiesced; but in 1850 the country had fallen under a ruler more active
in the employment of French power than any ruler since Louis XIV., except
Napoleon I., and for purposes almost personal he determined that France
should acquiesce no longer. The clerical party in France were gratified
by the mere knowledge that General Aupick had raised the question of
the Holy Shrines at the instance of the President. Throughout the year
1850 nothing was done of a serious character. The French Minister made
demands, and the Porte evaded them as best it might. But in the very
beginning of 1851 General Aupick imparted new life to the negotiations.
M. de Titoff, the Russian Minister, struck into the fray, and warned the
Porte that he should insist on the _status quo_. Then General Aupick
grew still warmer in his language, and the Austrian Minister supported
him. In the spring, the Marquis de Lavalette, a more energetic, indeed,
a "zealous" man, replaced General Aupick as the representative of France
at the Porte, and in his hands the business soon began to make progress.
During this period the British Minister, Lord Stratford de Redcliffe,
acting on instructions from home, held quite aloof from the disputes, and
contented himself with watching closely the contest between the Porte and
the French Minister. He thought that the Porte would not give way unless
forced, and the Emperor of Russia was so fully persuaded of the strength
of his influence at Constantinople that he felt convinced that no change
in the matter of the Holy Shrines would occur. But in this respect, as
in so many others, he was mistaken. In the autumn of 1851 the British
Minister began to see the gravity of the contest going on under his eyes;
for the Marquis de Lavalette, growing impatient at the delay of the Porte
in according his demands, talked in a menacing tone of the use that France
could make of the strong fleet then assembled at Toulon. It was at this
moment, November, 1851, that the quarrel visibly assumed the character of
a struggle between France and Russia for influence at Constantinople and
throughout the East.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account