Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
When the mischief was done they did not fail to adopt the most severe
measures. The French were the first to move. On the 15th of December M.
Drouyn de Lhuys wrote a despatch which reached Lord Clarendon the next
day. In this, after showing that Russia had given out that she would take
the offensive "in no quarter," and how her action had falsified that
assurance, he proposed that Admiral Dundas and Admiral Hamelin should
declare to the Russian admirals, that every Russian ship met at sea by
the Allies should thenceforward be "invited" to return to Sebastopol,
and that every subsequent act of aggression should be repelled by force.
Lord Cowley was desired by the Emperor personally to urge this measure on
the Government, and convey to them a sense of his great disappointment
if the suggestion were not adopted. On the same day, and before he
received Lord Cowley's letter, Lord Clarendon wrote to Lord Stratford de
Redcliffe, informing him that the most effectual means should be taken
to guard against a disaster similar to that of Sinope. He had no doubt,
he said, that the combined fleets had entered the Black Sea. "Special
instructions," he wrote, "as to the manner in which they should act do not
appear to be necessary. We have undertaken to defend the territory of the
Sultan from aggression, and that engagement must be fulfilled." On the
24th of December Lord Clarendon informed Lord Cowley that her Majesty's
Government agreed to the French proposal. It was not until the 27th that
he sent the formal instructions to Lord Stratford de Redcliffe, directing
him to inform the Russian admiral of the determination arrived at by
France and Britain. It was not until the same day that Lord Clarendon
instructed Sir Hamilton Seymour to make known to Count Nesselrode the
nature of the orders sent to the East, orders issued with "no hostile
design against Russia," but rendered imperative by Russian acts. Russia
was not to mistake forbearance for indifference, nor calculate on any
want of firmness in the execution of a policy having for its object the
maintenance of the independence and integrity of the Ottoman Empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account