Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of WalesAnonymous
History
Cassell's History of England, Vol. 6 (of 8): From the Death of Sir Robert Peel to the Illness of the Prince of Wales
Anonymous
Great Britain -- History
When she retired, that state of things was
not changed; Russia was still the domineering Power, and still held in her
hands the means of disquieting, threatening, nay, of attacking Turkey. No
doubt the object of the war enlarged with its progress; but that, within
certain limits, is common to all wars. Having gone to the vast expense of
sending armies and fleets to Turkey, the Allies would have been culpable
had they neglected to obtain the amplest possible security for the
independence and integrity of Turkey.
Towards the end of June the British Cabinet were engaged in considering
the important project submitted by the Duke of Newcastle. After some
deliberation, all parties assented, and the terms of the despatch to Lord
Raglan were finally agreed to on the 28th. In this despatch Lord Raglan
was instructed "to concert measures for the siege of Sebastopol, unless,"
so the terms ran, "with the information in your possession, but at present
unknown in this country, you should be decidedly of opinion that it could
not be undertaken with a reasonable prospect of success.... If, upon
mature reflection, you should consider that the united strength of the two
armies is insufficient for this undertaking, you are not to be precluded
from the exercise of the discretion originally vested in you, though her
Majesty's Government will learn with regret that an attack from which such
important consequences are anticipated must be any longer delayed." He was
further informed that, as no safe and honourable peace could be obtained
until the fortress was reduced, and the fleet taken or destroyed, nothing
but "insuperable impediments" was to prevent an early decision. These are
what have been called the "stringent instructions" directing the invasion
of the Crimea. They were supported by the voice of the nation and its
Parliament. Before the Cabinet had taken its decision, before it was known
that the siege of Silistria had been raised, Lord Lyndhurst in his place,
on the 19th of June, declared that "in no event, except that of extreme
necessity, ought we to make peace without previously destroying the
Russian fleet in the Black Sea, and laying prostrate the fortifications by
which it is defended." And in answer, Lord Clarendon, with more reticence
of language, spoke to the same effect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account