The feudality in France, in its oppressive sense, died long years before the Revolution, but the aristocracy still lives in spite of the efforts of the Assembly to crush it--the Assembly and the mob who sang: _"Ah! ça ira, ça ira, ça ira,_ _Les aristocrates à la lanterne!_ _Ah! ça ira, ça ira, ça ira,_ _Les aristocrates on les pendra!"_ And the French noblesse of to-day, the proud old French aristocracy, is not, on the whole, as bad as it has frequently been painted. They may, in the majority, be royalists, may be even Bonapartists, or Orléanists, instead of republicans, but surely there's no harm in that in these days when certain political parties look upon socialists as anarchists and free-traders as communists. The honour, power and profit derived by the noblesse in France all stopped with the Revolution. The National Assembly, however, refused to abolish titles. To do that body justice they saw full well that they could not take away that which did not exist as a tangible entity, and it is to their credit that they did not establish the new order of Knights of the Plough as they were petitioned to do. This would have been as fatal a step as can possibly be conceived, though for that matter a plough might just as well be a symbol of knighthood as a thistle, a _jaratelle_, a gold stick or a black rod. In France a whole _seigneurie_ was slave to the seigneur. Under feudal rule the clergy (not the humble _abbés_ and _curés_, but the bishops and archbishops) were frequently themselves overlords. They, at any rate, enjoyed as high privileges as any in the land, and if the Revolution benefited the lower clergy it robbed the higher churchmen. Just previous to the Revolution, the clergy had a revenue of one hundred and thirty million _livres_ of which only forty-two million five hundred thousand _livres_ accrued to the _curés_. The difference represents the loss to the "Seigneurs of the Church." With the Revolution the whole kingdom was in a blaze; famished mobs clamoured, if not always for bread, at least for an anticipated vengeance, and when they didn't actually kill they robbed and burned. This accounts for the comparative infrequency of the feudal châteaux in France in anything but a ruined state. Sometimes it is but a square of wall that remains, sometimes a mere gateway, sometimes a donjon, and sometimes only a solitary tower. All these evidences are frequent enough in the provinces of the Pyrenees, from the more or less complete Châteaux of Foix and of Pau, to the ruins of Lourdes and Lourdat, and the more fragmentary remains of Ultrera, Ruscino and Coarraze. The mediæval country house was a château; when it was protected by walls and moats it became a castle or château-fort; a distinction to be remarked. The château of the middle ages was not only the successor of the Roman stronghold, but it was a villa or place of residence as well; when it was fortified it was a _chastel_.