Catholic Churchmen in Science [First Series]: Sketches of the Lives of Catholic Ecclesiastics Who Were Among the Great Founders in ScienceWalsh, James J. (James Joseph)
Religion
Catholic Churchmen in Science [First Series]: Sketches of the Lives of Catholic Ecclesiastics Who Were Among the Great Founders in Science
Walsh, James J. (James Joseph)
Catholics; Religion and science; Scientists -- Biography
I have to thank the editors of the _American Catholic Quarterly
Review_, of the _Ave Maria_, and of _The Ecclesiastical Review_ and
_The Dolphin_, for their kind permission to republish the articles
which appeared originally in their pages. All of them, though
substantially remaining the same, have been revised, modified in a
number of particulars, and added to very considerably in most cases.
The call for a second edition--the third thousand--of this little
book is gratifying. Its sale encouraged the preparation of a Second
Series of CATHOLIC CHURCHMEN IN SCIENCE, and now the continued demand
suggests a Third Series, which will be issued during the year. Some
minor corrections have been made in this edition, but the book is
substantially the same.
{ix}
CONTENTS.
PAGE
PREFACE ix
I. THE SUPPOSED OPPOSITION OF SCIENCE AND RELIGION 3
II. COPERNICUS AND HIS TIMES 15
III. BASIL VALENTINE. FOUNDER OF MODERN CHEMISTRY 45
IV. LINACRE: SCHOLAR, PHYSICIAN, PRIEST 79
V. FATHER KIRCHER, S.J. SCIENTIST, ORIENTALIST, AND COLLECTOR 111
VI. BISHOP STENSEN: ANATOMIST AND FATHER OF GEOLOGY 137
VII. ABBÉ HAÜY: FATHER OF CRYSTALLOGRAPHY 169
VIII. ABBOT MENDEL: A NEW OUTLOOK IN HEREDITY 195
{x}
{1}
I.
THE SUPPOSED OPPOSITION OF SCIENCE AND RELIGION.
{2}
{3}
I.
THE SUPPOSED OPPOSITION OF SCIENCE AND RELIGION.
A common impression prevails that there is serious, if not invincible,
opposition between science and religion. This persuasion has been
minimized to a great degree in recent years, and yet sufficient of it
remains to make a great many people think that, if there is not entire
incompatibility between science and religion, there is at least such a
diversity of purposes and aims in these two great realms of human
thought that those who cultivate one field are not able to appreciate
the labors of those who occupy themselves in the other. Indeed, it is
usually accepted as a truth that to follow science with assiduity is
practically sure to lead to unorthodoxy in religion. This is supposed
to be especially true if the acquisition of scientific knowledge is
pursued along lines that involve original research and new
investigation. Somehow, it is thought that any one who has a mind free
enough from the influence of prejudice and tradition to become an
original thinker or investigator, is inevitably prone to abandon the
old orthodox lines of thought in respect to religion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account