Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnologySkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnology
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The Latin editions of Ptolemy are the earliest, and are greatly to be
preferred to the Greek. They were printed from a translation into
Latin by Jacob Angelus, and consist of an edition at Bologna bearing
the date 1462, but which is believed not to be the true date; one at
Vincenza in 1475, which is really the earliest edition; that of Rome,
1478, the first with maps; Ulm, 1482 and 1486; Rome, 1490 and 1507;
Venice, 1511; Strasburg, 1513, 1520, and 1522, in which the text is
compared with an old Greek MS.; an edition in 1525, which bears to be
a correction of Jacob Angelus’s translation by I. de Regiomonte, and
in which the principal changes introduced into the later Greek
editions first make their appearance; and the two editions by Servetus
in 1535 and 1541. The principal Greek editions are those of Erasmus in
1533 and 1546, Montanus in 1605, and Bertius in 1619. A recent edition
has appeared, by Dr. F. G. Wilberg, in 1838, from a collation of nine
MSS. with the editions of 1482, 1513, 1533, and 1535, and with a MS.
at Milan, another at Vienna, and two Latin MSS. collated by Mannert.
The author has himself collated for this work the Latin editions of
1482, 1486, 1520, 1522, 1525, 1535, with the Greek editions of 1605
and 1619, and with Wilberg’s edition, and he agrees with Mannert in
giving the preference among the early editions to the Ulm edition of
1482, and the Strasburg editions of 1520 and 1522. In the so-called
corrected edition of 1525 he has no confidence. The variations occur
both in the names and in the latitudes and longitudes. In cases where
all the editions agree, there can be no doubt as to the genuine text
used. When they differ, he has laid down the positions according to
the variant readings, and selected the one which best corresponded
with the appearance of the country. The agreement is mainly in the
position of the towns, and the variations in the features of the
coast, and are, therefore, more easily corrected.
Footnote 56:
The Vedra might more naturally be supposed to be the Tyne, but an
altar found at Chester-le-Street, on the Wear, on which the name Vadri
occurs, indicates the Wear as the river, to which indeed the name
bears a greater resemblance. There is no variation in the position of
these two places.
Footnote 57:
The early Latin editions have, instead of Ienae aestuarium, Fines
aestus. It is possible that this may be the correct reading, and that
Wigtown Bay may have marked the utmost limit to which the Roman troops
penetrated in Agricola’s second campaign.
Footnote 58:
The early Latin editions all read Leva. The edition of 1525 first
altered it to Deva, and is followed by the late editions, and also by
Wilberg; but the distance both from the Firth of Tay in the south and
from Kinnaird’s Head corresponds more exactly with the mouth of the
North Esk than with that of the river Dee.
Footnote 59:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account