Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and cultureSkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 2 (of 3), Church and culture
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
To the same period we may apply the description of the church of St.
Andrews given at the end of the larger legend of St. Andrew. We there
read that the ‘kingdom of the Picts having been entirely destroyed and
occupied by the Scots, the substance and possessions of the church
alternately increased or decreased as kings and chiefs showed devotion
to St. Andrew. Of these we cannot speak in detail, but we must treat
compendiously of what relates to ourselves. The royal city was called
Rymont, or royal mount, which King Hungus gave to God and the holy
apostle. Those holy men who brought the relics of the blessed apostle
having departed this life, as well as their disciples and followers, the
religious service there died away, as the people were barbarous and
uncultivated. There were kept up, however, by carnal succession, in the
church of St. Andrew, such as it then was, thirteen, commonly called
_Keledei_, whose manner of life was shaped more in accordance with their
own fancy and human tradition than with the precepts of the holy
fathers. Nay, even to the present day their practice continues the same;
and although they have some things in common, these are trifling in
amount and value, while they individually enjoy the larger and better
portion, just as each of them happens to receive gifts, either from
friends who are united to them by some unavoidable tie, such as kindred
or connection, or from those whose soul-friends, that is, spiritual
advisers, they are, or from any other source. And after they are made
_Keledei_ they are not allowed to keep their wives within their
lodgings, nor any other women who might give rise to injurious
suspicions. Moreover, there were seven “personæ,” or beneficiaries, who
divided among themselves the offerings of the altar, of which seven
portions the bishop used to enjoy but one and the hospital another; the
remaining five were apportioned to the other five members, who performed
no duty whatever either at altar or church, and whose only obligation
was to provide, after their custom, lodging and entertainment for
pilgrims and strangers when more than six chanced to arrive, determining
by lot whom and how many each of them was to receive. The hospital, it
is to be observed, had continual accommodation for a number not
exceeding six; but, from the time that, by God’s goodness, it came into
the possession of the canons, it has been open to all comers. The
above-mentioned beneficiaries were also possessed of their private
revenues and property, which, upon their death, their wives whom they
openly lived with, and their sons or daughters, their relatives or
sons-in-law used to divide among themselves; even the very offerings of
the altar at which they did not serve—a profanation which one would
blush to speak of, if they had not chosen to practise it.’ We are
further told that at this time ‘there were none who served at the altar
of the blessed apostle, nor used mass to be celebrated there, except
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account